Wow, the three newspapers with known anti-male bias just happen to be agitating for war in Ukraine.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (57)
sorted by:
Is there a newspaper that doesn't have anti-male, anti-white, anti-straight and anti-Christian bias?
The Daily Mail? But that's a British newspaper.
Although I'm sure, being British, it has put forward anti-male ideas.
Eh... wouldn't surprise me at all. It's just that these stupid ideas are in the air, and they sometimes find their manifestations in places where you do not expect it.
E.g. I lost a lot of respect for Skye Williams when he asserted that faggots are called faggots because they had to carry wood to be burned - when homosexuals were not burned in the UK but hanged, and the word faggot is completely unrelated to the word for pieces of wood.
But berating people who are deceived doesn't do any good. You have to stop these things at their source.
There's war in Ukraine since 2014.
I know it's hard to believe there's an ongoing war in Europe with and usually it's not even being reported on. Even here just across the border it was quickly forgotten after the "ceasefire" in early 2015 followed by trench warfare.
Source
Proof of anti-male bias :
New York Times praises male genocide advocate Valerie Solanas
Washington "Why can't we hate men" Post
Wall Street Journal praises anti-male reddit hate sub
I imagine you understand the problem now. Tradcucks and white trailer trash. They deserve to live as slaves. They've earned it. Just try helping the people that put in the effort to actually understand what's going on and let the rest go.
Yes, trads are bad, pale, basement-dwelling MGTOW crypto-Nazis are the solution.
I'm not a Nazi, and I sold all my crypto.
Didn't say you were.
But those who won't reproduce aren't exactly the solution to anything.
You didn't get my joke, I'm disappointed.
I mean, they're a solution to the problem of overpopulation. But still, to defeat evil, you don't need to be the solution to every other problem.
"Ant & Imp bickering" is one of my favourite aspects of KIA3 honestly.
Did I miss something?
I wonder if I'll ever get permission to create a community. ConPro already has 3.
I did get it, and I quite liked it. It's nice when you show your more fun side.
There isn't a problem of overpopulation though, especially not in the developed world. Birth rates are under replacement levels.
If you make humanity extinct, I guess you 'defeated evil'.
Wow, you're every diligent today - this claim is so blindingly obvious that even I would not have asked for your evidence.
Yes, indeed. "Build Back In a More Feminine Way" is real, they've been saying it, they are serious about it.
ConPro : "But muh joos are behind it all. Muh joos made women bad! Muh joos make everything bad, they took my perfect Aryan tradwife!"
cant wait for george soros to get metood
wait bros... was epstein just rape tortured by feminists to death??
Bill Gates actually was, but we didn't hear a word from you people about that.
Remind me, what gender is Ghislaine Maxwell? But the fact that she lived is completely irrelevant, of course. No, no. The idea that a woman is procuring little boys for her feminist allies to torture and rape is absolutely absurd. Just keep chasing after Prince Andrew because he slept with a 17 year old. Like a cat after a fucking laser pointer.
who the fuck is prince andrew?
The person accused by completely credible victim Virginia Guiffre of being a customer of Epstein.
cool? 'royalty' being pedophiles, shiver me timbers.
you know where'd you'd fit in? south korea. they literally have satanic manhating dykes running the show there. as it stands you're just embarrassing yourself ignoring all reason and logic to grasp at the flimsiest straws in your attempt to psyop this forum off any actual credible truth.
but korea is already the perfect consumerist shithole so maybe you're not really needed...
Funny, that's exactly what I think of you and your ConPro leather gimps.
the difference is we have a point when we show people that 2% are doing 50%+ of fucky things
you have none when you show 50% are responsible for around 15% and most of that comes back to the 2% anyway
Imagine using old talking points from wars in the ME without understanding them and looking like a fucking moron for it.
Where's the oil in Ukraine? Where's...anything of value at all? Seriously. I'll admit you're right if you can find a single thing of value in Ukraine.
The black-earth soil, first of all. Then there are coal and uranium mines, and arms plants, and warm water ports, and other strategic interests Russia desires evidently much (including 40 million people).
Coal is worthless in 2022.
Most countries are closing nuclear plants.
He said it's a banker war. Where's the profit?
Sheningans like https://www.dw.com/en/ukrainian-oligarchs-private-armies-flex-their-muscles/a-18346008
Very interesting article. It's a weird thought, private armies for the very rich.
I wasn't even looking for them, but they still show up.
In more detail: https://warontherocks.com/2017/09/ukraines-volunteer-militias-may-have-saved-the-country-but-now-they-threaten-it/
Not (only) bankers, but it's actively sponsored by oligarchs on both sides. Some literally formed military units, and one bank for example gave their armored cars to their militia. Poroshenko himself had been "king of chocolate" before he became the first war president.
I'll give you that, but I think he was meaning people with no ties to the region. The well beaten dead horse of the "Jewish Banking Elite" beloved by commies and feminist puppets alike.
Not to Russia's big-spender ally, that does all their business in USD - China. They need a ton of coal, and since Australia cut them off, and they are in no way shrinking usage despite "promises" to be carbon neutral, Russia is their next best bet.
It is primarily about control over the Black Sea and blocking NATO from expanding. Russia and allies (Turkey, Georgia) control the majority of the Black Sea's territorial waters and access through the Bosporus Strait, adding Ukraine would give Russia near total control.
These are prime military routes, as well as Russian gas and oil shipping routes into Europe (via the Mediterranean Sea). Allowing Russian oil and gas to reach Europe and be sold for Euros would seriously threaten the US-Saudi Petro dollar duopoly.
Surely you want to say, enemies?
Georgia in particular being still at war (ceasefire only and Crimea style occupation of parts). And Turkey-Russia quasi-proxy war continues in places like Syria and Libya (also ceasefires for large scale hostilties, but still).
Good points. As with all things political, they are selectively "allies" when it comes to keeping NATO out of the region. Turkey, specially has a lot to gain from oil/gas commerce going through the strait.
Turkey's literally NATO and Georgia wants to be NATO.
Turkey is "NATO", but it is also a Russian "ally". Not a black and white situation. They will side with the winner and whoever brings them tariffs through the strait.
https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/86251
Georgia fears Russia (see 2008 crisis) and will fall in line once Russia brings Ukraine down, also there is a large pro-Russia sentiment in Georgia, specially from ethnic Russians, families of Georgian ex-pats working in Russia and ex-soviet block over 50 people.
I am not an expert, but I have lived in Kharkiv, and what we get here is not a complete picture of the region.