Okay, mentioning that it is neither rare nor mild is "misinformation". You're splitting hairs.
What's the worst, 200 out of a million? Whether or not you call that 'rare' is a personal choice, as rare is one of those weasel words.
I don't support this, but you're just blatantly lying again. Don't say that "this is what the bill does". At least admit that this is what you think the bill MAY do, or that this is what you fear.
From the idea of preventing sex selective abortion.
No, show me what country has this supposed principle.
But I'm specifically talking about NZ. Then again, they'd probably just fuck with the numbers like they did with the vaccine deaths and the Covid cases.
Oh right, I forgot that your worldview is completely immune to any outside evidence. Like any good ideologue, you judge the facts based on how well they fit your worldview, rather than the other way around.
Considering the head of the NHS who is in charge of reviewing the data is a vile man-hating feminist...that data isn't worth the energy used to make the pixels on your screen show it.
It's no different anywhere else, bud.
Everywhere where sex-selective abortions are banned?
Jesus Christ, are you autistic? What countries are those, was the question. Third time now.
I want to keep the discussion to the place we're talking about.
What is there to discuss, when you ignore any facts that contradict your worldview as either fake or the result of blackmail by wahmen.
That's true, and a rather sad indictment of the medical profession. Not one of them can be trusted to not be an ideologically corrupted sadist.
No, the stats are no different anywhere else. Weren't you praising Denmark, and even excusing that it has a Pro-Genocide Nazi Prime Minister, because it banned AstraZeneca? Or not using Moderna because of high rates of myocarditis? Or Hong Kong?
If it isn't obvious, I don't know. Start with everywhere that whined about "China's missing daughters".
You made a claim that abortions are not allowed beyond the point where you can determine sex. Are you now telling me that you were full of it all along?
There aren't any facts. They literally refuse to print the data. That, to me, is an admission of guilt.
What's the worst, 200 out of a million? Whether or not you call that 'rare' is a personal choice, as rare is one of those weasel words.
I don't support this, but you're just blatantly lying again. Don't say that "this is what the bill does". At least admit that this is what you think the bill MAY do, or that this is what you fear.
No, show me what country has this supposed principle.
Oh right, I forgot that your worldview is completely immune to any outside evidence. Like any good ideologue, you judge the facts based on how well they fit your worldview, rather than the other way around.
It's no different anywhere else, bud.
Jesus Christ, are you autistic? What countries are those, was the question. Third time now.
What is there to discuss, when you ignore any facts that contradict your worldview as either fake or the result of blackmail by wahmen.
No, the stats are no different anywhere else. Weren't you praising Denmark, and even excusing that it has a Pro-Genocide Nazi Prime Minister, because it banned AstraZeneca? Or not using Moderna because of high rates of myocarditis? Or Hong Kong?
You made a claim that abortions are not allowed beyond the point where you can determine sex. Are you now telling me that you were full of it all along?
LOL. "The data" that you literally made up.