You need to watch some Aaron Clarey. HAVING money does not make you more desirable. SPENDING money does. This is why the dudebros who are the most popular with women are usually borderline or actual frauds with sub-500 credit ratings.
I guess you’re right. Not very useful to them if you aren’t spending it on them. Unless they’re in for the long con and want to try to take half of it.
Like, suppose you're a software engineer minimalist. You make 150k but you have a tiny, economy apartment or starter house, cheap beater car and don't spend much on clothes. Maybe you have one or two hobbies you splurge on (gaming rig? minifigs? crypto speculation?) but to outside appearances you look poor unless someone saw your balance sheet.
You're right, I've seen people with way less money than me blow it on impressing women and pretending to be rich. They're all frauds, but the woman won't care, as long as she gets her tithe.
Still, some are in for the long con and look for people who are very frugal to see if they have secret wealth.
Correct and the reason for this is women see men who spend their money easier to part with their money for the woman. Men who save their money are harder to get the man to spend it on women. Cryptos signify a man easily parted with his money because cryptos aren't a real investment yet it likely correlates with someone who isn't actually dirt poor or whose vice in spending money isn't something that would supersede a woman's priority, like a man with a gambling addiction. Crypto hits all the right buttons for women.
Definitely the case for shitty women/short-term flings. However, I'd say not excessively spending is a good thot-filter. Some will sniff this out though, gotta stay diligent.
I used to have a super-diversified crypto portfolio, but it all hit my stop loss to hold a slight profit when the market absolutely crashed. Now I don't have any.
As I said, it's basically just for the sake of why not. It's a very small amount of money. I don't care much, so I don't really follow the comings and going of it.
women are always sniffing out the next best deal. men that take big risks and make big rewards are attractive. especially if they are confident about it too. they've already won, and they're proven risk-takers - both hugely attractive.
If a guy takes a big risk and it doesn't work out... well, that's part of why women are always sniffing around for the next big deal to hop on. They pick from among the winners. The losers are discarded.
It's not exactly a mystery that women are biologically attracted to men with status, who can provide them with the necessary protection for their kids.
My objection is that you take the word of this 'study' for it. You can find a 'study' that says almost anything, cause social science is utter crap.
I'm so sick of biology being used as an excuse. If we want to go that far, why aren't we murdering each other over disagreements and capturing women from opposing men as sex slaves.
Right...because we moved past base desires. Maybe they should try to evolve past fucking cave people too.
Biology can be controlled if you want it to. My biology wants me to have kids. I don't fucking want to. So I don't.
I'm so sick of biology being used as an excuse. If we want to go that far, why aren't we murdering each other over disagreements and capturing women from opposing men as sex slaves.
We apply the same standards to men. Why are men attracted to young, healthy, physically fit women? The question answers itself. You can't run from biology.
Right...because we moved past base desires. Maybe they should try to evolve past fucking cave people too.
So be attracted to 70-year-old fat hags.
Biology can be controlled if you want it to. My biology wants me to have kids. I don't fucking want to. So I don't.
Not true, unless you are a woman. As a man, you don't know if you have kids or not - i.e., if your genes have spread. You just desire to have sex. Even if you have stopped for a while.
But you can. Biology can make you want them but you can have enough control over yourself to not chase them.
I'm not attracted to any of them. That's pre-pandemic me. I grew up and realised pissing away my life spending the night with women I have no interest in other than silencing my base instincts is pointless. The world is so much clearer if you aren't constantly being brainwashed by defective brain chemistry trying to make you have kids.
Money=more desirable
No shit.
No.
You need to watch some Aaron Clarey. HAVING money does not make you more desirable. SPENDING money does. This is why the dudebros who are the most popular with women are usually borderline or actual frauds with sub-500 credit ratings.
I guess you’re right. Not very useful to them if you aren’t spending it on them. Unless they’re in for the long con and want to try to take half of it.
Like, suppose you're a software engineer minimalist. You make 150k but you have a tiny, economy apartment or starter house, cheap beater car and don't spend much on clothes. Maybe you have one or two hobbies you splurge on (gaming rig? minifigs? crypto speculation?) but to outside appearances you look poor unless someone saw your balance sheet.
That ain't hot.
You're right, I've seen people with way less money than me blow it on impressing women and pretending to be rich. They're all frauds, but the woman won't care, as long as she gets her tithe.
Still, some are in for the long con and look for people who are very frugal to see if they have secret wealth.
Those are the sort who will push you to get abusive in sex, take pictures afterwards and then take you to the cleaners in divorce court.
https://media.communities.win/post/UhAzmBFfYI2n.jpeg
And that's why I was never into rough sex, despite knowing so many girls that apparently liked it.
Correct and the reason for this is women see men who spend their money easier to part with their money for the woman. Men who save their money are harder to get the man to spend it on women. Cryptos signify a man easily parted with his money because cryptos aren't a real investment yet it likely correlates with someone who isn't actually dirt poor or whose vice in spending money isn't something that would supersede a woman's priority, like a man with a gambling addiction. Crypto hits all the right buttons for women.
It is not money but status that makes you attractive.
Money can give you status, but other things can as well.
No, it's the APPEARANCE of status.
Take your typical pre-crash scumbag land developer. Drives a Ferrari, has the wardrobe of Leisure Suit Larry, inevitably dating a hot blonde...
Owes three banks money and is under investigation by the feds.
Definitely the case for shitty women/short-term flings. However, I'd say not excessively spending is a good thot-filter. Some will sniff this out though, gotta stay diligent.
So boys... I have a tiny bit of crypto. A super tiny minuscule lulz amount. Hit me up. You know you want it.
Out of curiosity, what coin?
Bitcoin and Ethereum. And some absolute change in random cheap crap that was promotional, so for free.
Very basic.
I used to have a super-diversified crypto portfolio, but it all hit my stop loss to hold a slight profit when the market absolutely crashed. Now I don't have any.
As I said, it's basically just for the sake of why not. It's a very small amount of money. I don't care much, so I don't really follow the comings and going of it.
women are always sniffing out the next best deal. men that take big risks and make big rewards are attractive. especially if they are confident about it too. they've already won, and they're proven risk-takers - both hugely attractive.
If a guy takes a big risk and it doesn't work out... well, that's part of why women are always sniffing around for the next big deal to hop on. They pick from among the winners. The losers are discarded.
I have doge.
I have no gf.
Imagine believing crappy 'studies'.
I mean, it checks out with what I believe and have witnessed.
It's not exactly a mystery that women are biologically attracted to men with status, who can provide them with the necessary protection for their kids.
My objection is that you take the word of this 'study' for it. You can find a 'study' that says almost anything, cause social science is utter crap.
I'm so sick of biology being used as an excuse. If we want to go that far, why aren't we murdering each other over disagreements and capturing women from opposing men as sex slaves.
Right...because we moved past base desires. Maybe they should try to evolve past fucking cave people too.
Biology can be controlled if you want it to. My biology wants me to have kids. I don't fucking want to. So I don't.
We apply the same standards to men. Why are men attracted to young, healthy, physically fit women? The question answers itself. You can't run from biology.
So be attracted to 70-year-old fat hags.
Not true, unless you are a woman. As a man, you don't know if you have kids or not - i.e., if your genes have spread. You just desire to have sex. Even if you have stopped for a while.
But you can. Biology can make you want them but you can have enough control over yourself to not chase them.
I'm not attracted to any of them. That's pre-pandemic me. I grew up and realised pissing away my life spending the night with women I have no interest in other than silencing my base instincts is pointless. The world is so much clearer if you aren't constantly being brainwashed by defective brain chemistry trying to make you have kids.
But why would I?
You only exist because of that.
Because it makes your life easier, your wallet fatter and your time disappear less quickly.
That's not an argument.
that feeling is confirmation bias. when you feel it you should train yourself to take a closer look and be more skeptical.