Yet more male births is perfectly natural. 105:100 is the usual ratio, backed by years of data.
That's what all these "leaders" puppeted by feminism forget. Their majority female population is highly unnatural and I'd put money on it being even higher majorities if you take out the recent immigrants from the refugee circlejerk. Maybe that's why they did it, so people didn't see 53-54% female and go - aren't we accusing China of endorsing genocide for this but the other way?
What has a majority female population given us? The worst society in a hundred years.
The amount of men imported into these countries is more than enough to nullify the effect of early deaths. There's no reason for that majority to exist unless it's being influenced.
You're completely missing the point so lemme spell it out for you:
The problem is the generational competition induced by hypergamy. Having a surge of men will skew the arms race BETWEEN men for access to women because older men have more wealth and resources.
The difference doesn't immediately go away with age. As each successive generation ages, the differential gap remains, soaked up by women dating older, wealthier men (persisting even after the initial population skew ages out).
For the CCP this is a very bad thing because it means they will persistently have a group of tens of millions of young batchlors, who's own cohort women are dating up.
How long will that state of affairs last until those young men decide "fuck it, civil war".
Yes, it is.
A male skewed population imbalance is a recipe for societal unrest and intergenerational warfare.
China has basically two options. They can either expend that imbalance in a foreign war, or wait until the imbalance precipitates a civil war.
Yet more male births is perfectly natural. 105:100 is the usual ratio, backed by years of data.
That's what all these "leaders" puppeted by feminism forget. Their majority female population is highly unnatural and I'd put money on it being even higher majorities if you take out the recent immigrants from the refugee circlejerk. Maybe that's why they did it, so people didn't see 53-54% female and go - aren't we accusing China of endorsing genocide for this but the other way?
What has a majority female population given us? The worst society in a hundred years.
Yes, and by the time they reach age 25 that ratio has been Darwin awarded down to 99:100.
I work in INSURANCE, TI1. I know firsthand how many young men get darwinned the second they get their hands on something with an engine.
The amount of men imported into these countries is more than enough to nullify the effect of early deaths. There's no reason for that majority to exist unless it's being influenced.
You're completely missing the point so lemme spell it out for you:
The problem is the generational competition induced by hypergamy. Having a surge of men will skew the arms race BETWEEN men for access to women because older men have more wealth and resources.
The difference doesn't immediately go away with age. As each successive generation ages, the differential gap remains, soaked up by women dating older, wealthier men (persisting even after the initial population skew ages out).
For the CCP this is a very bad thing because it means they will persistently have a group of tens of millions of young batchlors, who's own cohort women are dating up.
How long will that state of affairs last until those young men decide "fuck it, civil war".