That's about like me when they started talking about putting pronouns in email signatures. I just quit signing emails. My company hasn't told us to put pronouns, although I have seen them. Particularly if from some sales or marketing types.
See, this is a much better approach than your reflexive sperging. Far more effective and has the chance of yielding positive results regardless of your aims by simply reintroducing the concept on a subconscious level that women can be evil or even just wrong.
Nah, this is totally on Microsoft. Users screech about all kinds of things. I'm sure the actual number of firms demanding PC Police in their documents is very small. (and even they must understand it's one of those "nice to have" feature requests)
With Microsoft's defacto monopoly on word processing, they could easily ignore such requests and focus on more important improvements and nobody would think twice about it.
Well, it's what offices want, unfortunately. When you make corporate software, you have to obey corporate (Read: HR) demands.
You can choose not to correct it.
This is a feature that HR wants for everyone. It will soon be in all emails.
And I will continue ignoring it.
Women can have some words though. Some that suit their character.
Murderess for example. Bioweapon research chairwoman.
Maybe that's what we should do. Only use feminine terms for the worst kinds of people.
That's about like me when they started talking about putting pronouns in email signatures. I just quit signing emails. My company hasn't told us to put pronouns, although I have seen them. Particularly if from some sales or marketing types.
They're worse than HR. I'd make a post on it, but the last time I put effort into a post, nobody read it.
See, this is a much better approach than your reflexive sperging. Far more effective and has the chance of yielding positive results regardless of your aims by simply reintroducing the concept on a subconscious level that women can be evil or even just wrong.
It's time to emancipate email. Go back to letters.
Nah, this is totally on Microsoft. Users screech about all kinds of things. I'm sure the actual number of firms demanding PC Police in their documents is very small. (and even they must understand it's one of those "nice to have" feature requests)
With Microsoft's defacto monopoly on word processing, they could easily ignore such requests and focus on more important improvements and nobody would think twice about it.
Speaking of which, Phil's still bitching about COD Lobby trash talk and how he wants to ban pRoBLeMaTiC bIgOts from playing xbox.