That's about like me when they started talking about putting pronouns in email signatures. I just quit signing emails. My company hasn't told us to put pronouns, although I have seen them. Particularly if from some sales or marketing types.
I thought it was a pretty accurate assessment of the streaming service business-and-marketing model. Fill your virtual shelves with cheap schlock, keep a few big-ticket items on prominent display (e.g. Netflix dropping a billion on Friends and Seinfeld), and when people have a habit of flicking through random titles looking for something watchable, they may watch the propaganda schlock or they may not, but as long as they don't drop their subscription, you're winning. The quality* content and sloth factor subsidize the wokist bullshit.
See, this is a much better approach than your reflexive sperging. Far more effective and has the chance of yielding positive results regardless of your aims by simply reintroducing the concept on a subconscious level that women can be evil or even just wrong.
And I will continue ignoring it.
Women can have some words though. Some that suit their character.
Murderess for example. Bioweapon research chairwoman.
Maybe that's what we should do. Only use feminine terms for the worst kinds of people.
That's about like me when they started talking about putting pronouns in email signatures. I just quit signing emails. My company hasn't told us to put pronouns, although I have seen them. Particularly if from some sales or marketing types.
They're worse than HR. I'd make a post on it, but the last time I put effort into a post, nobody read it.
What, the subscription service one?
I thought it was a pretty accurate assessment of the streaming service business-and-marketing model. Fill your virtual shelves with cheap schlock, keep a few big-ticket items on prominent display (e.g. Netflix dropping a billion on Friends and Seinfeld), and when people have a habit of flicking through random titles looking for something watchable, they may watch the propaganda schlock or they may not, but as long as they don't drop their subscription, you're winning. The quality* content and sloth factor subsidize the wokist bullshit.
Quit your whining or provide data/arguments to refute me.
Huh?
See, this is a much better approach than your reflexive sperging. Far more effective and has the chance of yielding positive results regardless of your aims by simply reintroducing the concept on a subconscious level that women can be evil or even just wrong.