In our own time the whole of Greece has been subjected to a low birth rate and a general decrease of the population, owing to which cities have become deserted and the land has ceased to yield fruit, although there has been neither continuous wars or epidemics... For as men had fallen into such a state of prententiousness, avarice, and indolence that they did not wish to marry, or if they married to rear the children born to them, or at most as a rule but one or two of them, so as to leave these in affluence and bring them up to waste their substance, the evil rapidly and insensibly grew.
You seem to continue to agree with all the leftist fundamental assumptions. So yes, please elaborate how continuing down this dysgenic path is actually a good thing.
You are antinatalist and antifamily. Antinatalism and liberating women from the family are feminist positions. Thus, you're a feminist.
It is men that need to be liberated.
The only reason birth rates are pushed is because the Ponzi scheme of the welfare state will collapse without a growing population.
How'd that work out for Greece?
-Polybius
Do I really need to list all the ways the modern day is better equipped for population collapse?
You seem to continue to agree with all the leftist fundamental assumptions. So yes, please elaborate how continuing down this dysgenic path is actually a good thing.