this is false. the fact that you can see it means you can copy it. that's how computers work. NFT only acts as digital legal title, but it still requires government to enforce that legal title. there's no mechanism that magically makes all computers honor NFTs.
especially in this case, the NFT is stupid because the images are in public domain. there is no legal title. the NFT is simply a lootbox that gives you a copy of that public domain image that you could find elsewhere for free. there's no need for an actual NFT here and no benefit conferred by using an NFT.
Theres a couple of vids floating around of the guy behind those lion NFTs and that dude looks about as slimy as you'd imagine, i mean my god. But... if people want to give that bozo money its none of my business.
all this image sales stuff NFTs are being used for right now is not what NFTs were designed to be used for and there's no actual benefit to using NFTs. this was just what they got a bunch of dumbasses to think has value.
NFTs are a programmable title record, nothing more. when these people are going out of their way to digitally generate thousands of slight variation images of block art, or even using public domain images, the fact that an NFT is being used is meaningless.
Original vs Copy is irrelevant to digital copies. The blockchain showing you paid for your copy is meaningless when it comes with no further rights. It isn't a copyright or an exclusive use contract or anything else with legal meaning.
Really, the proof, in the blockchain, that you paid money for something freely available is closer to a 'proof of retardation' than anything else.
the point is "the original" can be infinitely copied in the digital realm. that's how computers work. you're clamoring for DRM 30 fucking years late in an economic internet that has rejected DRM for decades.
"the original" has no value over any copy when we're talking about the internet.
watch some gary v and he goes over this shit. there are a lot of fucktards spending on the bubble of useless NFTs that don't mean shit. these are retards who don't understand what an NFT is... just like you have no fucking clue what an NFT is.
an NFT is nothing more than digital title. if the value of what's attached to the NFT relies on that, that's fine. if it is something as simple as something that can be infinitely replicated on the dark web, that NFT is for suckers.
this is false. the fact that you can see it means you can copy it. that's how computers work. NFT only acts as digital legal title, but it still requires government to enforce that legal title. there's no mechanism that magically makes all computers honor NFTs.
especially in this case, the NFT is stupid because the images are in public domain. there is no legal title. the NFT is simply a lootbox that gives you a copy of that public domain image that you could find elsewhere for free. there's no need for an actual NFT here and no benefit conferred by using an NFT.
The NFT isn't the image. The NFT is a blockchain-based claim of ownership of the image. In that sense, it is unique.
You can download it as a picture on your computer, but it won't be the original which is what gives it value.
Why is this upvoted? Are people this retarded?
To clarify: we understand why you think NFTs are legitimate. We just think it’s comically stupid.
People really are this retarded
Theres a couple of vids floating around of the guy behind those lion NFTs and that dude looks about as slimy as you'd imagine, i mean my god. But... if people want to give that bozo money its none of my business.
Because value is subjective.
bingo.
all this image sales stuff NFTs are being used for right now is not what NFTs were designed to be used for and there's no actual benefit to using NFTs. this was just what they got a bunch of dumbasses to think has value.
NFTs are a programmable title record, nothing more. when these people are going out of their way to digitally generate thousands of slight variation images of block art, or even using public domain images, the fact that an NFT is being used is meaningless.
Look around you. Yes, people are this retarded.
It's amazing how many mouth breathers we have on this site who can't understand supply and demand.
I'm not supporting NFT's. I'm simply pointing out how they work.
Original vs Copy is irrelevant to digital copies. The blockchain showing you paid for your copy is meaningless when it comes with no further rights. It isn't a copyright or an exclusive use contract or anything else with legal meaning.
Really, the proof, in the blockchain, that you paid money for something freely available is closer to a 'proof of retardation' than anything else.
Tell that to the morons who are buying these things.
you have no fucking clue what i just said.
no one said the NFT is the image.
the point is "the original" can be infinitely copied in the digital realm. that's how computers work. you're clamoring for DRM 30 fucking years late in an economic internet that has rejected DRM for decades.
"the original" has no value over any copy when we're talking about the internet.
watch some gary v and he goes over this shit. there are a lot of fucktards spending on the bubble of useless NFTs that don't mean shit. these are retards who don't understand what an NFT is... just like you have no fucking clue what an NFT is.
an NFT is nothing more than digital title. if the value of what's attached to the NFT relies on that, that's fine. if it is something as simple as something that can be infinitely replicated on the dark web, that NFT is for suckers.
To you and me it has no value, but it does to others. Just because you don't value something doesn't mean others feel the same way.
you're still not understanding.
an NFT functionally does nothing in these cases than not having an NFT. it literally accomplishes nothing.
digital images are infinitely copyable. the NFT doesn't stop that. the NFT only represents legal title on something where legal title is irrelevant.