Well, you haven't cited a single historian of the 'official school', nor said what is incorrect about the narrative.
They all usually say the similar things.
Correct.
If you can't accept this explanation, I'm moving on. There's no point beating the dead horse.
Like I said, you cannot actually substantiate your claims. Probably because it is based on feelings and suspicions, and nothing else. You have not actually read any work of history about World War II, but you feel comfortable to sweepingly dismiss all of it as 'lies' all the same.
Yeah well, given my anecdote, it's understandable why I'd be so distrustful of what the western historians say or what wikipedia says about the past. You haven't given me anything while I at least gave you why I'm very doubtful of the western interpretation of history of 20th century.
Well, you haven't cited a single historian of the 'official school', nor said what is incorrect about the narrative.
Correct.
Like I said, you cannot actually substantiate your claims. Probably because it is based on feelings and suspicions, and nothing else. You have not actually read any work of history about World War II, but you feel comfortable to sweepingly dismiss all of it as 'lies' all the same.
Yeah well, given my anecdote, it's understandable why I'd be so distrustful of what the western historians say or what wikipedia says about the past. You haven't given me anything while I at least gave you why I'm very doubtful of the western interpretation of history of 20th century.
You haven't even said what you're distrustful of, except 'Western everything' - a general which is justified, by the way.