yeah i remember some interview with putin where the mouthwhore was asking him about his criticism off ngos and got all whiney when he informed her that the west had a couple hundred ngos infiltrating russia, while russia only had 1 in america.
But honestly, I don't think it's one person. It seems more like there are whole different external groups trying to control entire agencies. I don't even think it's an organized cabal. I think we're looking at entirely different swathes of elites vying for power over separate agencies.
Biden isn't just weak, he actually reminds me of Alexander's corpse: each fiefdom leader tearing at it to deny another hegemony.
There are internicine power struggles and disagreements over the particulars of how to implement the progressive vision, but at the highest levels(WEF and the like) there is an organized cabal that is very open about what their end goals are.
The globalists are absolutely using NGO's as extensions of their own power to wage an ideological war on pretty much everyone, particularly European powers. Breaking them is a direct attack on the actions of globalist structures like the EU.
And just to be clear: the feeling from the EU to Lukashenko is mutual. They'd be happy to have him and his family dead.
Yup NGOs, like the old quangos, are a dream for an unaccountable civil servant with an agenda to push.
No oversight, no accountability and yet still wielding governmental power. It's no wonder they're being pushed everywhere, what fascist could dream of such a thing being accepted so quietly and meekly by the populace?
The fascists were actually very into this. So were a lot of the socialists, but the fascists moreso. It's an extension of "Technocracy".
People think that means actually being governed by experts in their field, but that's never been true. Instead, it means being governed by technical bureaucrats that are sure they know better than you.
Technocracy is less about being governed by Einstein, and more like being governed by the just the patent office.
What a Chad
Yes he is an autocrat but you don't go in a Belarusian jail for protesting school meetings.
yeah i remember some interview with putin where the mouthwhore was asking him about his criticism off ngos and got all whiney when he informed her that the west had a couple hundred ngos infiltrating russia, while russia only had 1 in america.
Yeah, I'd be more worried about China's NGO's and Corporations ... ... ... and friendly government agencies.
Does the White House count as a NGO yet? It's obviously not governing anything.
If it wasn't governing anything, I'd be happy.
Instead it governs everything wrong.
It's pretty clear the White House is just a front. I'm not sure who is calling the shots, but it isn't anyone at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Of that, I'm sure.
But honestly, I don't think it's one person. It seems more like there are whole different external groups trying to control entire agencies. I don't even think it's an organized cabal. I think we're looking at entirely different swathes of elites vying for power over separate agencies.
Biden isn't just weak, he actually reminds me of Alexander's corpse: each fiefdom leader tearing at it to deny another hegemony.
There are internicine power struggles and disagreements over the particulars of how to implement the progressive vision, but at the highest levels(WEF and the like) there is an organized cabal that is very open about what their end goals are.
Not a fan, but he's not wrong.
The globalists are absolutely using NGO's as extensions of their own power to wage an ideological war on pretty much everyone, particularly European powers. Breaking them is a direct attack on the actions of globalist structures like the EU.
And just to be clear: the feeling from the EU to Lukashenko is mutual. They'd be happy to have him and his family dead.
We literally talk about how he should retire to his family while he's threatening wars.
Also most EU countries don't even care. Mostly just the ones with shared borders.
Yup NGOs, like the old quangos, are a dream for an unaccountable civil servant with an agenda to push.
No oversight, no accountability and yet still wielding governmental power. It's no wonder they're being pushed everywhere, what fascist could dream of such a thing being accepted so quietly and meekly by the populace?
The fascists were actually very into this. So were a lot of the socialists, but the fascists moreso. It's an extension of "Technocracy".
People think that means actually being governed by experts in their field, but that's never been true. Instead, it means being governed by technical bureaucrats that are sure they know better than you.
Technocracy is less about being governed by Einstein, and more like being governed by the just the patent office.
I freaking love this guy
Alexander "Better to be a dictator than be gay" Basedenko.