ah so its the whole you dont want the rules to apply to you but you want it to apply to others when it comes to "certain other topics" that you don't like being discussed is it?
Also the point is you would rather keep the rule because you dont want people talking about the Jews, whilst you cry that you got banned for talking about women.
Garbage people in some position of power. That's the key.
When the whole narrative aligns across every media outlet and your leaders are talking about how women are "indisputably better" (Obama, 44th President) or how we need to "rebuild in a more feminine way" (Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister), it's more than just a conspiracy.
When you then end up with installed leaders with very questionable mental states that just happen to serve a feminist agenda, then you really have to think.
When you then see that those who approved the safety of the major vaccines were also women, as are the CDC and FDA chiefs, then you think a little more.
When you realize the virus lab was staffed nearly entirely by women...
The 50% that is so unrepresented in positions of influence (in their own words) is weirdly never far from every terrible thing that happens to men.
It's almost like those genocidal fantasists of the past have grown up and slowly worked their way into positions of power.
The NYT praised Valerie Solanas, labeling her manifesto a "must read".
Bezos' WaPo printed an opinion article titled "why can't we hate men".
CNN claimed "patriarchy kills people" in an article a few years ago after a rise in shootings.
State-funded NPR gave glowing praise to a book where all men are killed by a disease, calling it a "critique of patriarchy".
The state-funded BBC stood up for a female murderer, then tore apart a man appealing the same logic of being pushed to kill by his partner's abuse.
The Guardian is a feminist Der Sturmer knockoff, I don't even need to provide examples, because everyone knows.
I could keep going, but I don't know enough languages to call out all their propaganda worldwide. I'm sure the likes of La Repubblica in Italy, Marca in Spain, Bild in Germany and even the much talked about Charlie Hebdo in France would have the same.
It absolutely is the prevailing opinion of those who work in "journalism".
It's probably not common in terms of absolute number of people, but in today's culture (thanks social media) the influencers with those crazy opinions are the most influential. They push the Overton window even if people aren't explicitly agreeing with those ideas. There's implicit agreement where push-back doesn't exist.
But I don't think it's nearly the most important issue of our time.
Did you know that we're in the 3rd year of a global femicide crisis and that, for the first time in all of recorded history, there are fewer women on Earth than men because of how many men are killing women? In the US a woman is murdered by a man, usually, an intimate partner, every six hours.
The natural sex ratio in humans is approximately 1.05 males per female at birth. That it was ever normal for women to outnumber men was a consequence of men being disproportionately likely to die.
In almost every country in the entire world, women have longer life expectancy than men.
If women being less numbered than men for the first time ever is a "femicide crisis", then we've had a "menicide" crisis for the past thousand years, since men were always less numbered before. Yet no one ever really cares about that, right?
Unless the murders gets to #1 death cause, it's likely not a cause at all as to why there are less females than before anyway. Natural causes / sickness are still the top cases for deaths, nothing we can really do about that except wait for better medicine tech.
"In the US a woman is murdered by a man, usually, an intimate partner, every six hours."
That's about 1460 women per year. There are 3 millions death per year in the US (so 1.5 million women). Saying those 1460 deaths per year is enough to justify a "femicide crisis" is just plain stupid. Imagine you have a million dollars, then claim you're "basically a homeless" because you lost a thousand. You have to put numbers in perspective.
Yes, the ones who survive male violence live longer than men because double X chromosomes confer stronger immune systems.
A woman being murdered by a man every six hours in this country is absolutely a crisis of women's safety. And that's only taking into account this country. If you re-read my statement, I noted that this a global situation, occurring everywhere as cultural misogyny has soared over the last decade.
You're under no obligation to give a flying fuck about your mother, your grandmother, your sister, based upon your disdain for women I'm gonna doubt you have a female sexual partner and for that matter any daughters --- but don't delude yourself into thinking you're One of The Good Guys while supporting not just violence against women but the murders of women.
If you re-read my statement, I noted that this a global situation, occurring everywhere as cultural misogyny has soared over the last decade.
If global misogyny has soared over the last decade it might be worthwhile looking into the why of it. Seems like an odd collective unconscious decision for all men to make regardless of their culture or background.
Yes, the ones who survive male violence live longer than men because double X chromosomes confer stronger immune systems.
Wait, what? Are you implying that literally every woman either "survive" or die from male violence? You're going to need some hard evidences to convince me of such thing. I'm waiting.
A woman being murdered by a man every six hours in this country is absolutely a crisis of women's safety.
Ah yeah, cause sharing facts is indeed "disdain for women". Like, you don't know me, don't even know if I'm male or female, don't know where I'm from, but clearly, because I dared challenge your numbers, I must hate women, no other option possible.
but don't delude yourself into thinking you're One of The Good Guys
Are you? I don't see you doing much for women to be honest. Talking on a random internet forum won't stop those murders you keep talking about.
while supporting not just violence against women but the murders of women.
Tell me where in my messages did I approve of any violence or murders of any kind.
The killing of female infants in China and I think India too would account for the ratio being messed up. Assuming that's true about the ratios. Two most populous countries in the world and all.
It's funny how nobody connects the big talk about killing others to the amount of times they end up killed.
You're only good at directly killing the elderly and small children, those who are too weak to fight back. Otherwise you have to try and abuse government power to get a legal distinction for yourselves to give you a chance to kill others, as you did in the UK.
Plus if you add the amount killed by Covid-19, because the lab was led by a woman, you're the most prolific murderers in the last decade by far. That's without adding the male suicides feminist policy has caused and the 41%ers that were brought into an ideology that came from you backing a child rapist out of hatred for us.
Can't kill all men if we all identify as transwomen.
Checkmate.
Can't kill me if I have more war training and they decide to be more confrontational!
Wont be my fault!
If i made new year's resolutions on Twitter that say the same shit but about women i would be called an incel and banned
If I said this here, I'd get another Rule 16 ban.
Then support getting rid off rule 16 altogether then.
This sub doesn't need to become more like ConsumeProduct.
ah so its the whole you dont want the rules to apply to you but you want it to apply to others when it comes to "certain other topics" that you don't like being discussed is it?
When you can point out that the entire rest of the internet is filled with Jews hating on non-Jews as women do on men, then you can talk.
Points to the talmud And also this.
https://files.catbox.moe/fi6byq.pdf
Also the point is you would rather keep the rule because you dont want people talking about the Jews, whilst you cry that you got banned for talking about women.
You people do know nobody trusts your links, right?
Maybe if you pretend your opponents have nothing in common, you can act like you are surprised when they tell you.
I'm aware it's been posted before.
Garbage people in some position of power. That's the key.
When the whole narrative aligns across every media outlet and your leaders are talking about how women are "indisputably better" (Obama, 44th President) or how we need to "rebuild in a more feminine way" (Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister), it's more than just a conspiracy.
When you then end up with installed leaders with very questionable mental states that just happen to serve a feminist agenda, then you really have to think.
When you then see that those who approved the safety of the major vaccines were also women, as are the CDC and FDA chiefs, then you think a little more.
When you realize the virus lab was staffed nearly entirely by women...
The 50% that is so unrepresented in positions of influence (in their own words) is weirdly never far from every terrible thing that happens to men.
It's almost like those genocidal fantasists of the past have grown up and slowly worked their way into positions of power.
Amazing how she wants to kill so many transmen, and all the transwomen who haven't come out yet and are still in the closet/shy/scared of society.
Blue checkmark means Publisher Twitter officially endorses this person.
Good job almost none of the media can complete step 1 because they're all too much backstabbing bitches to form human attachment.
Because it was the one I had saved.
Also because they've been very quiet since Covid. You'll find hardly any post-2020 because they want us to trust them and hope we'd forget the past.
The NYT praised Valerie Solanas, labeling her manifesto a "must read".
Bezos' WaPo printed an opinion article titled "why can't we hate men".
CNN claimed "patriarchy kills people" in an article a few years ago after a rise in shootings.
State-funded NPR gave glowing praise to a book where all men are killed by a disease, calling it a "critique of patriarchy".
The state-funded BBC stood up for a female murderer, then tore apart a man appealing the same logic of being pushed to kill by his partner's abuse.
The Guardian is a feminist Der Sturmer knockoff, I don't even need to provide examples, because everyone knows.
I could keep going, but I don't know enough languages to call out all their propaganda worldwide. I'm sure the likes of La Repubblica in Italy, Marca in Spain, Bild in Germany and even the much talked about Charlie Hebdo in France would have the same.
It absolutely is the prevailing opinion of those who work in "journalism".
It's probably not common in terms of absolute number of people, but in today's culture (thanks social media) the influencers with those crazy opinions are the most influential. They push the Overton window even if people aren't explicitly agreeing with those ideas. There's implicit agreement where push-back doesn't exist.
But I don't think it's nearly the most important issue of our time.
Did you know that we're in the 3rd year of a global femicide crisis and that, for the first time in all of recorded history, there are fewer women on Earth than men because of how many men are killing women? In the US a woman is murdered by a man, usually, an intimate partner, every six hours.
The natural sex ratio in humans is approximately 1.05 males per female at birth. That it was ever normal for women to outnumber men was a consequence of men being disproportionately likely to die.
In almost every country in the entire world, women have longer life expectancy than men.
If women being less numbered than men for the first time ever is a "femicide crisis", then we've had a "menicide" crisis for the past thousand years, since men were always less numbered before. Yet no one ever really cares about that, right?
Unless the murders gets to #1 death cause, it's likely not a cause at all as to why there are less females than before anyway. Natural causes / sickness are still the top cases for deaths, nothing we can really do about that except wait for better medicine tech.
https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/People/Sex-ratio/Total-population Check all the developed countries, they all have more women than men. The countries that have more men than women (like China) have many more serious/important problems.
"In the US a woman is murdered by a man, usually, an intimate partner, every six hours."
That's about 1460 women per year. There are 3 millions death per year in the US (so 1.5 million women). Saying those 1460 deaths per year is enough to justify a "femicide crisis" is just plain stupid. Imagine you have a million dollars, then claim you're "basically a homeless" because you lost a thousand. You have to put numbers in perspective.
Yes, the ones who survive male violence live longer than men because double X chromosomes confer stronger immune systems.
A woman being murdered by a man every six hours in this country is absolutely a crisis of women's safety. And that's only taking into account this country. If you re-read my statement, I noted that this a global situation, occurring everywhere as cultural misogyny has soared over the last decade.
You're under no obligation to give a flying fuck about your mother, your grandmother, your sister, based upon your disdain for women I'm gonna doubt you have a female sexual partner and for that matter any daughters --- but don't delude yourself into thinking you're One of The Good Guys while supporting not just violence against women but the murders of women.
Men are murdered more frequently by the kids that your gender raised.
Fuck off.
If global misogyny has soared over the last decade it might be worthwhile looking into the why of it. Seems like an odd collective unconscious decision for all men to make regardless of their culture or background.
Shhh, you're being an incel now. How dare you say women are hated because they are hateful...
Is your goal to be taken seriously as a retard?
Watch this account go stormfagging later. I'm going to keep an eye on it.
Not you, I mean the femicide propagandist.
It seems to be relatively aware, except for the global femicide crisis obsession.
Not Vagrant.
My point was to monitor this account for traditional feminist tactics of divide and conquer as well as (I hate this fucking word) disinformation.
Regardless of whether you agree with racial politics or not, seeing a feminist shill speaking them is very suspicious.
Wait, what? Are you implying that literally every woman either "survive" or die from male violence? You're going to need some hard evidences to convince me of such thing. I'm waiting.
80% of all victims from murders are men. A man is 4x more likely to die from murder than a woman. So yeah, if this is a "women crisis", I wonder what's a "men crisis" then. https://www.statista.com/statistics/251877/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-race-ethnicity-and-gender/
Ah yeah, cause sharing facts is indeed "disdain for women". Like, you don't know me, don't even know if I'm male or female, don't know where I'm from, but clearly, because I dared challenge your numbers, I must hate women, no other option possible.
Are you? I don't see you doing much for women to be honest. Talking on a random internet forum won't stop those murders you keep talking about.
Tell me where in my messages did I approve of any violence or murders of any kind.
The killing of female infants in China and I think India too would account for the ratio being messed up. Assuming that's true about the ratios. Two most populous countries in the world and all.
That would be part of it, but the region where there are more males than females extends further than the region with unnaturally high birth sex ratios. In either case, Vagrant is out of line for suggesting that the United States has anything to do with this when they're still on the more-females-than-males side of the line.
Is this a Poe or did someone just slip something in your coffee?
How many of those women attacked first?
It's funny how nobody connects the big talk about killing others to the amount of times they end up killed.
You're only good at directly killing the elderly and small children, those who are too weak to fight back. Otherwise you have to try and abuse government power to get a legal distinction for yourselves to give you a chance to kill others, as you did in the UK.
Plus if you add the amount killed by Covid-19, because the lab was led by a woman, you're the most prolific murderers in the last decade by far. That's without adding the male suicides feminist policy has caused and the 41%ers that were brought into an ideology that came from you backing a child rapist out of hatred for us.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: He was careful and didn't violate this rule.