"Hanebrink declines to engage in counting how many Jews were communists. He identifies this question as misleading because to answer it one would have to use rigid ethnic categories when there were none. "
But also
"Hanebrink quotes the reaction of a Romanian gendarmerie inspector at the close of an investigation in 1941 that aimed to ascertain how many Jews had served the Soviets. It turned out that in one particular county, only three out of 128 local officials had been Jews."
So I was curious enough to click, and it turns out he apparently wrote an entire fucking book on dodging questions and double standards about when it is and isn't ok to use rigid ethnic categories.
For all your rants about how "the stormfags are coming!" you dig up more anti-semitic stuff than anyone.
Well if that link is evidence of what your idea of a fact is, I think the answer to that question is because you seem to choose which blatantly biased ideological shill pieces to believe based on whether they disagree with your favourite strawman or not.
But also
So I was curious enough to click, and it turns out he apparently wrote an entire fucking book on dodging questions and double standards about when it is and isn't ok to use rigid ethnic categories.
For all your rants about how "the stormfags are coming!" you dig up more anti-semitic stuff than anyone.
And yet, facts seem to disagree with ALL the claims stormcucks cook up. Why is that?
Well if that link is evidence of what your idea of a fact is, I think the answer to that question is because you seem to choose which blatantly biased ideological shill pieces to believe based on whether they disagree with your favourite strawman or not.
This reads a lot like projection that an SJW does when they are proven wrong. On that question, why do you choose to be an SJW?
Haha, awww, reading comprehension isn't your strong suit and FYI "no, you!" doesn't work on anyone who didn't flunk out of highschool.
Here's hoping maybe one day you'll find out what your strong suit is if it isn't reading, internet arguments, or making tolerable YouTube videos.