The theory is sound: the government can prohibit you from saying you got a warrant, but not prohibit you from not saying you didn't get a warrant.
The problem is, it assumes the government plays by the rules. I can see a judge saying that removing the canary statement is tantamount to saying you got a warrant and ordering the site to leave it up.
At that point, the court is ordering you to lie, but your only recourse is to litigate it for three years, by which time it won't matter anymore anyway.
I can see a judge saying that removing the canary statement is tantamount to saying you got a warrant and ordering the site to leave it up.
The canary doesn't have to be removed in order to be invalid, it just stops being updated with the latest date or message - and that's how you know the website is compromised.
That's no longer a gag order and, aside from that, any lawyer worth their salt would fight that and win.
FWIW, I've also been on sites with canaries that have expired (most recently Voat.co), with the admin checking up once in a while, and ignoring all requests from people asking him to update the canary.
It became obvious the site was compromised. The canary worked.
Attached to the bottom of any government demand backed by soldiers with guns. That's all it takes.
What you're describing is a banana republic. America isn't quite there, yet.
The theory is sound: the government can prohibit you from saying you got a warrant, but not prohibit you from not saying you didn't get a warrant.
The problem is, it assumes the government plays by the rules. I can see a judge saying that removing the canary statement is tantamount to saying you got a warrant and ordering the site to leave it up.
At that point, the court is ordering you to lie, but your only recourse is to litigate it for three years, by which time it won't matter anymore anyway.
The canary doesn't have to be removed in order to be invalid, it just stops being updated with the latest date or message - and that's how you know the website is compromised.
"oh, and don't stop updating your warrant canary"
Attached to the bottom of any government demand backed by soldiers with guns. That's all it takes.
That's no longer a gag order and, aside from that, any lawyer worth their salt would fight that and win.
FWIW, I've also been on sites with canaries that have expired (most recently Voat.co), with the admin checking up once in a while, and ignoring all requests from people asking him to update the canary.
It became obvious the site was compromised. The canary worked.
What you're describing is a banana republic. America isn't quite there, yet.