The new unspeakable N-word, apparently (the game's written by Sam Maggs too)
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (82)
sorted by:
You it's possible for both cases to be true, right?
Knowing the weirdo male feminists that staffed Activision-Blizzard and the kind of shit they got up to, it's pretty obvious what went down.
The dumb male feminists tried to sexually manipulate a couple BPD girls who turned it on its head and became a cat and mouse game. Of course the men lost in the end. Both sides are awful people, but the women weren't completely retarded and knew how the game worked better than the men did.
Just based on what we know, they are guilty of being powerful men with groupies (which is only a crime randomly when we decide it is) and then abusing their work seniority to be lazy.
There is absolutely nothing wierdo about it other than them being a bunch of nerds instead of the rockstars you associate with the position.
The one actual "crime" that stands out is sharing that girl's nudes around until she killed herself, and that's basically every high school in America right now.
The problem is women in the workplace. Everywhere you see men and women together you will have sexual tension and it will lead to events like this.
Whether it’s a game company or the military, the pattern repeats.
I am of the opinion that quid-pro-quo sexual favors for business advancement is morally and ethically wrong, and should be illegal, because it's basically glorified prostitution.
Both parties are guilty.
Then we cannot have women and men in the same workplace. As long as the two genders exist, some form of that will always exist. Even if it is not explicit, the rule will be broken at some point and even without a victim the "crime" has happened.
What you are describing is nepotism is wrong, and networking is ethically wrong and should be illegal. And if you want to start with that be my guest, but you are basically upending the entire way jobs work to do so.
You're twisting my words into something they're not.
I am specifically against the trade of sexual favors for financial gain.
I do not care about nepotism so long as the people involved are competent.
Male feminists are a byproduct of white knighting and manipulation of men. Women pretending to be “raped” or “sexually assaulted” has become so convoluted that it is a joke term now.
You assume that these men aren't just perverts using the guise of "male feminism" to hide their guilt.
I'm saying that both sides are trying to take advantage of the other, and the women are more adept at utilizing their tribal connections to do so.
I have no problem with any weird shit the weirdo male feminists got up to short of quid-pro-quo sexual harassment or rape. Anything less is fake microaggression drama, blown out of proportion up to gain power. (or offense taken by the women because they considered the men in the lower 80% and beneath them)
Considering the weirdos that work/ed at Blizzard, I'm about as sure as a man can be that quid-pro-quo sexual trades were the norm.
The women willingly went along with it and then, once it was no longer beneficial to their career, turned it around and sold out their business partners while playing the victim.
if it's not illegal then they did nothing wrong.