It will probably trip at least a few of them up. Because if they approve of people being required to show they are considered medically safe to do things needed to live, like grocery shopping, then surely they should agree that doing something that's instead a voluntary act entirely unnecessary for personal survival, yet holds the same type of potential danger (infection of a third party), should also be subject to the same sort of restrictions. I know the dangers of HIV/AIDS has been downplayed in the past few years, but I think the average person will still recognize that AIDS is worse than the wuflu.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
I will be brutally honest. I can't blame a person for fucking executing those "muh vibrant AIDS sex life" people for endangering them. Like if someone did that to me... I would probably snap.
Seriously. If someone knowingly gave me AIDs, they're getting fucking domed and idgaf about prison at that point.
"Law Abiding Citizen" comes to mind. Domed? Nope. Not that easily. After they've been taken apart piece by fucking piece? Waste of ammo.
Via Appia...