Carthage couldn't conceive of ruling Rome, so they were wiped out by the Romans who couldn't conceive of a Mediterranean not dominated by a single power. The Confederacy had no intention of ruling Yankees, so they were wiped out by the Union who had no intention of letting the empire fracture. The left believes they are engaged in a fight to the death with an existential enemy, and the right doesn't want to fight anyone. This is why conservatives are doomed to failure.
The Carthaginians were sacrificing babies, which offended the Romans so much that they decided to wipe it off the map. Of course power and prestige were factors as well, but the initial disgust against their practices is not to be underestimated.
That's a great reason to crush the enemy and salt the land. Unfortunately, progressive child sacrifice rituals aren't enough motivation for the modern conservative bugmen.
That's because we live inside Carthage now. Germany was taking the same kind of role Rome did, but was shut down. America Pre-WWII would look at this modern state as the Romans did to Carthage, but they were led into battle either way.
They have been literally sacrificing children and casting spells through Hollywood. They came up with the Internet and much of our technology specifically to brainwash us to lead into a Luciferian NWO, rebuilding the Tower of Babel (globalization) that God originally scattered into Nations to prevent that.
So now we move further into Revelation, they likely will succeed to a point before God destroys Babylon and the Satanic false jews (Rev 3:9) once and for all (Rev 17-18). But it seems to me around half of the global population will die first from medical tyranny and some sort (a third in Rev 6:8) of potential solar flare event (a fourth of what's left over in Rev 9:18).
I'm not sure that child sacrifice or abandonment was really as shocking an idea to the Romans as you might think. After all, their founders, Romulus and Remus, were abandoned in the elements. It was a not uncommon practice.
It was Christianity that brought that kind of thing to an end.
It's not abandonment, it's literally putting children into a pit of flame to burn them alive. The Romans did not want to do human or animal sacrifices because they saw them as abhorrent, but they still had some practices like that remaining in their celebrations.
The Romans did not want to take over Carthage and rule it as conquerors, they wanted it burned to the ground and all the citizens slaughtered. You don't do that unless you have powerful emotions guiding you.
The Romans did not want to take over Carthage and rule it as conquerors, they wanted it burned to the ground and all the citizens slaughtered. You don't do that unless you have powerful emotions guiding you.
They wanted Carthage's territory and wealth. They wanted to destroy a rival. Cato's famous expression (roughly) -- "Carthago delenda est!" / "Carthage must be destroyed" was his call to war. Rome had already fought two wars with Carthage, and Cato believed Carthage was becoming too wealthy and might again challenge Rome. Carthage must be destroyed.
Fighting against a rival to gain dominance is one of the most fundamental animal and human behaviors.
Roman culture was brutal by our modern, Western standards. Animal sacrifice was common and accepted part of religion. The Romans even had an priest official -- the haruspex -- whose job was to examine the entrails of scarified animals for messages from the gods.
Crucifixion of rebellious slaves, enemies, criminals, etc., was common place.
Gladiatorial combat to the death and other blood sports were common.
You're right that the Romans did not perform human sacrifice (or very, very rarely sacrificed humans), but there doesn't seem to be any major moral drive to defeat Carthage. Carthage was an economic and military rival. They fought. It's the story of human history.
Even the article you linked says, regarding Carthaginian child sacrifice:
'Indeed, contemporary Greek and Roman writers tended to describe the practice as more of an eccentricity or historical oddity – they're not actually very critical.
'We should not imagine that ancient people thought like us and were horrified by the same things.'
They didn't have "all the citizens slaughtered", they enslaved them. As usual. Of course, some were ritually executed. As usual.
You're reading way too much into Roman propaganda. Look how they were OH MY GODS outraged whenever their captive soldiers were being sacrificed (by the British druids or the German witches), or by the Gaul practice of headhunting, despite routinely torturing their own prisoners to death in public (including but not limited to crucifixion) or forcing them to kill each other in what they called "games" for the enjoyment of what they called "mob". Hypocritical pricks. Nice civilization tho. Even if just culturally appropriated from the Greeks, after murdering their way all through Greece.
Btw they also honestly believed, or wanted their people to believe, that Christians were literally bloodthirsty cannibals.
Yeah I was going to say that. The Roman people often deposed of female babies too, as it was a cultural standard to just have one girl. I know it's not the same as sacrificing many children but it's not a million miles away from it at the same time. I could be wrong about all that, but I'm pretty sure I read that in The Rise of Christianity by Rodney Stark
Carthage couldn't conceive of ruling Rome, so they were wiped out by the Romans who couldn't conceive of a Mediterranean not dominated by a single power. The Confederacy had no intention of ruling Yankees, so they were wiped out by the Union who had no intention of letting the empire fracture. The left believes they are engaged in a fight to the death with an existential enemy, and the right doesn't want to fight anyone. This is why conservatives are doomed to failure.
The Carthaginians were sacrificing babies, which offended the Romans so much that they decided to wipe it off the map. Of course power and prestige were factors as well, but the initial disgust against their practices is not to be underestimated.
That's a great reason to crush the enemy and salt the land. Unfortunately, progressive child sacrifice rituals aren't enough motivation for the modern conservative bugmen.
That's because we live inside Carthage now. Germany was taking the same kind of role Rome did, but was shut down. America Pre-WWII would look at this modern state as the Romans did to Carthage, but they were led into battle either way.
People must wake up and realize who these Satanic Edomites really are, they are not the Biblical Hebrews.
They have been literally sacrificing children and casting spells through Hollywood. They came up with the Internet and much of our technology specifically to brainwash us to lead into a Luciferian NWO, rebuilding the Tower of Babel (globalization) that God originally scattered into Nations to prevent that.
So now we move further into Revelation, they likely will succeed to a point before God destroys Babylon and the Satanic false jews (Rev 3:9) once and for all (Rev 17-18). But it seems to me around half of the global population will die first from medical tyranny and some sort (a third in Rev 6:8) of potential solar flare event (a fourth of what's left over in Rev 9:18).
I'm not sure that child sacrifice or abandonment was really as shocking an idea to the Romans as you might think. After all, their founders, Romulus and Remus, were abandoned in the elements. It was a not uncommon practice.
It was Christianity that brought that kind of thing to an end.
It's not abandonment, it's literally putting children into a pit of flame to burn them alive. The Romans did not want to do human or animal sacrifices because they saw them as abhorrent, but they still had some practices like that remaining in their celebrations.
The Romans did not want to take over Carthage and rule it as conquerors, they wanted it burned to the ground and all the citizens slaughtered. You don't do that unless you have powerful emotions guiding you.
They wanted Carthage's territory and wealth. They wanted to destroy a rival. Cato's famous expression (roughly) -- "Carthago delenda est!" / "Carthage must be destroyed" was his call to war. Rome had already fought two wars with Carthage, and Cato believed Carthage was becoming too wealthy and might again challenge Rome. Carthage must be destroyed.
Fighting against a rival to gain dominance is one of the most fundamental animal and human behaviors.
Roman culture was brutal by our modern, Western standards. Animal sacrifice was common and accepted part of religion. The Romans even had an priest official -- the haruspex -- whose job was to examine the entrails of scarified animals for messages from the gods.
Crucifixion of rebellious slaves, enemies, criminals, etc., was common place.
Gladiatorial combat to the death and other blood sports were common.
You're right that the Romans did not perform human sacrifice (or very, very rarely sacrificed humans), but there doesn't seem to be any major moral drive to defeat Carthage. Carthage was an economic and military rival. They fought. It's the story of human history.
Even the article you linked says, regarding Carthaginian child sacrifice:
They didn't have "all the citizens slaughtered", they enslaved them. As usual. Of course, some were ritually executed. As usual.
You're reading way too much into Roman propaganda. Look how they were OH MY GODS outraged whenever their captive soldiers were being sacrificed (by the British druids or the German witches), or by the Gaul practice of headhunting, despite routinely torturing their own prisoners to death in public (including but not limited to crucifixion) or forcing them to kill each other in what they called "games" for the enjoyment of what they called "mob". Hypocritical pricks. Nice civilization tho. Even if just culturally appropriated from the Greeks, after murdering their way all through Greece.
Btw they also honestly believed, or wanted their people to believe, that Christians were literally bloodthirsty cannibals.
Yeah I was going to say that. The Roman people often deposed of female babies too, as it was a cultural standard to just have one girl. I know it's not the same as sacrificing many children but it's not a million miles away from it at the same time. I could be wrong about all that, but I'm pretty sure I read that in The Rise of Christianity by Rodney Stark
The early Christians were surrounded by rumors of cannibalism.
Like the Romans were morally virtuous. They destroyed anyone who refused to bend to their will...