On one hand, the reason why these thots got destroyed was because of their own short sightedness and stupidity. Nothing new - leftist feminists never think farther than 1 day into the future.
On the other hand, there's a bigger problem to be addressed.
Part of the reason why Alex Jones and a lot of so-called fringe conservatives got deplatformed was because of these very banks. If banks and payment processors are forcing OF to change their model then that pretty much is the Next Step in the ahem... BANKERS... overtaking us is it not?
I know a lot of people are celebrating this but it kinda proves the point that the ...bankers/payment processors... are becoming so much of a problem it's even starting to finally affect the left.
So what's next to do?
I'm putting ellipses to emphasize a common /pol/ narrative by the way lol.
Exactly. I don't know why it's so hard to understand that there are different sides of feminism on this. After all, sex is women's biggest tool in manipulating men. It should be obvious that there are different opinions among feminists on how to best use this - whether to work together to control the supply (and raise the price), or whether they should be allowed individually to simply exploit sex to the max.
Here's the big problem for me.
On one hand, the reason why these thots got destroyed was because of their own short sightedness and stupidity. Nothing new - leftist feminists never think farther than 1 day into the future.
On the other hand, there's a bigger problem to be addressed.
Part of the reason why Alex Jones and a lot of so-called fringe conservatives got deplatformed was because of these very banks. If banks and payment processors are forcing OF to change their model then that pretty much is the Next Step in the ahem... BANKERS... overtaking us is it not?
I know a lot of people are celebrating this but it kinda proves the point that the ...bankers/payment processors... are becoming so much of a problem it's even starting to finally affect the left.
So what's next to do?
I'm putting ellipses to emphasize a common /pol/ narrative by the way lol.
It means Sex Negative Feminism has a bigger grip than THOT Feminism (they are not Sex Positive unless it is for themselves.)
Exactly. I don't know why it's so hard to understand that there are different sides of feminism on this. After all, sex is women's biggest tool in manipulating men. It should be obvious that there are different opinions among feminists on how to best use this - whether to work together to control the supply (and raise the price), or whether they should be allowed individually to simply exploit sex to the max.
its not feminist, its the woke venture capital faggoots