One of the biggest pitfalls of common discourse is allowing people who want you dead to define the argument. Thomas Sowell became prominent because he did not let the trappings of political arguments be the only possible answers. Stop using the term white, I’m Slavic, Germanic, and Nordic. This means me and people from the Mediterranean have fuck all in common but we are still classified the same. As an American I have nothing in common with Germans, yet I am classified in the same group. Playing by these stupid identity games only gives these quibbling retards validation. Want to discriminate legitimately? Use their culture. We already know that ghetto black culture is shit, we already know that central and South American culture is shit, we already know that Northwestern American culture is shit. The practices a culture implements shows over generations, black American who eat vegetables and don’t down hundreds of grams of sugar a day magically live past 65. Asian families have been growing taller in America thanks to access to real food. A culture defines your genetics tomorrow.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (110)
sorted by:
It's true we'd like to purge all communists, but I don't see how that makes me a race traitor. They (and you) are the race traitors. Just because I want my people to succeed and be free doesn't mean I have to accept all whites. That's like saying "If you love animals you must allow mice to live in your house".
If you want me to believe you're willing to concede something, tell me something from the official narrative of WW2 you don't believe, and answer this: Why do you think National Socialists believe what we believe? Is it because we're jealous of jews? We like making people angry? We're brainwashed? Brainwashed as adults after being taught a very accurate version of history in school? To believe in something that will make most people hate us? If you believe that you're very naive, have a low IQ, or you're a shill.
Yes it does. Booker T Washington and W.E.B. DuBouis had this issue with blacks and even they had to accept that no matter the political orientation, the uplifting of black people, individually and as a whole, was an imperative. They argued against each other for being polar opposites, but they also were prepared to credit each other, and help one another to uplift blacks regardless of political divide.
You will never do that.
You are a Socialist first, and a white person second. Socialism, forever and always, takes priority above all things. You would kill 100 million whites before taking a single loss to your Socialist pride.
Because you are Socialists who are hungry to use race as a means to power. You will kill all the whites you want so long as you get power for yourself. Just as the the German National Socialists killed as many Germans as they could imagine to seize and maintain their power above all other things.
Partly, yes. You aren't mad at anything the jews have ever done. You think you are in an eternal race war for dominance. You're not mad about jews. You're mad because you think you are loosing.
Absolutely. Anger is an effective means to power. Manipulating people's emotions to get you to do what you say is a tactical objective, as with all Leftists.
It depends on whether or not you're one of the Useful Idiots of your own faction.
On the contrary stupid, you're not low IQ. Fascism and National Socialism were always the realm of the Intellectual class. It was the use of the IQ measurement as a political device that lead the Intellectual Elite into adopting Racialism as a Progressive concept. Mixed with Social Darwinism, their Racialist ideology reinforced their understanding of themselves as the pinnacle of human evolution at that time. Ivy League Intellectuals saw themselves as the next evolutionary step, and they felt that they were being threatened by the dangerous mass of low IQ jews that would cause the Malthusian population bomb to go off! Well, by racial necessity, mass depopulation of undesirable races was very Progressive. Whether it was through population control in eugenics, forced relocation programs, or just open extermination.
They were clearly high IQ, but were still fucking retarded. This partly demonstrated by Malthusian Theories being completely wrong, and for thinking that Jews were inherently low IQ. But, Leftist Ideology normally works that way.
But these progressive intellectual attitudes are why Richard Spencer is doing the right thing from your ideological perspective. He thinks the political wind is shifting such that Racialism, particularly White Identitarianism, is going to orbit around Leftism... because he's right and it always has. That's where all the fertile recruiting ground is going to be: among authoritarian, politically racialized, and emotionally resentful whites. The Right is becoming more anti-government (which is a promotion of Liberalism which you have to destroy), and is promoting religious values (which explicitly reject racialism as divisive to the religion).
There is a reason why so many Communists joined the Fascist and National Socialist movements. You'll have a lot more luck with Bernie Bros than Libertarians. This is because you are Leftists, and the Bernie Brows are an easy sell.
Try this: Go to a Bernie Bro, Yang Gang, or Tulsi fan, and ask them if they'd support a National Labor
FrontUnion.