As you may know there have been a variety of background for mass shooters.
A woman shot up google headquarters when youtube demonetized her videos:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/04/nasim-najafi-aghdam-youtube-shooting-demonetisation-payments-father
A trans person shot up their school:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-colorado-shooting/transgender-teen-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-for-deadly-colorado-school-shooting-idUSKCN24Q00D
And there's so many mass shootings in gangland in chicago you can't even list them all out.
But the press likes to push only the ones that meet their man-hating narrative - when the shooter is a white man - like recently:
https://archive.ph/hSkPM
Apparently this is his reddit post history:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210813174435/https://old.reddit.com/user/Jake3572
**Of the last 24 posts he made - 12 of them were to one of reddits protected man-bashing hate subs - **IncelsInAction.
The sub description of itself:
This sub is for mocking the antics of anyone who identifies themselves as "incel." This is a term popularised on Reddit and 4chan meaning "involuntarily celibate" i.e. men who can't get laid. Some of them get really really mad about it, and here are their stories...
...
Incels who comment in here can expect to be relentlessly mocked by this community. If you don't like it, don't post here.
Did reddit's protection of it's anti-male subs contribute to this shooting?
It seems a lot more plausible than the banned "men going their own way" sub.
That's quite a jump. 16 year old girls and 18 year old girls are fundamentally the same. It's not like there's actually much added maturity in those two years. And no, this isn't a "what if the child consents" argument, I'm not advocating for lowering it to 16, I'm saying that the comparison you made is asinine.
What they say in private is different to how they act when around other people. Also, half of those posts are women false flagging. I spoke to a few, as a "misogynist", they messaged me a few times asking why I wasn't depressed like them. It's because I understand that feminists created the system to make us depressed. You have to rise above it. Call them out, make sure everyone knows, but never let it break you.
That's not very nice. Also, what other communities exist where women can't enter? They define themselves by that because it keeps women from trying to influence their group - which is why they screech so loudly about how these people are a threat. Because even places like here or TD, they don't actively gatekeep to ensure feminist sympathizers don't enter.
There will likely never be a day where feminist leaders face a real court case like a Nuremberg Trial and actually have to admit their crimes publicly before their execution. That doesn't change the fact that individual acts will just embolden the feminist message that everyone who (correctly) hates them should be sectioned off from society.
I disagree, but it's beside the point. If this is what you believe, then this is the argument that you should have made, not "IT IS LEGAL THEREFORE GOOD", which is the argument that you actually made, and which is quite a bad argument.
I made no comparison. I merely applied the standard that you set.
They are? Should I ask how you know this, or will I think better of it because I know you will answer something like: because women are evil and evil responses must inherently come from them, men are not capable of them.
The truth is rarely very 'nice'.
So being a guy who can't get laid is just a cover for them wanting to... not have women in those communities? Which - you claim - is not very successful because half of the posts are false flags by women?
Will never cease to be amazed at your ability to paint yourself as the victim.
My point is that you can't call someone a pedophile for doing something that is legal in a Western country. It's absurd that they jump on this argument without any research.
Because Reddit doesn't mark handshake accounts and the nature of incels is to use throwaways in case women try to dox them. It makes it ridiculously easy to false flag, which is the point of them using doxxing. It causes the change in behavior that benefits their strategy.
No, they really are unable to get laid, but they formed a community around that to avoid women's influence. They can't influence anything if their only option is to false flag with throwaways, so they use media and government to get their way.
Who said I'm their victim? I'm just going to repost the list I posted when they said "misogyny" was the motive.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jvytVDkZ/x/c/4JDDSEEc3FR
12 years old is legal in some Western countries. Yes, I will call someone a pedophile for that. Also, the 'Western countries' is something that you added in later on, moving the goalposts from your original "BUT IT IS LEGAL IN THE UK!"
Alright, if one cannot verify the identities of those who are posting, how are you so sure that half are women false flagging?
You're confessing to misogyny now?
Which ones? I don't know of any. Regardless, you're just deliberately skewing the argument. Nobody is condemning the UK for having an age of consent that is too low, so the accusations are nothing more than vile smear tactics, typical of feminists and their sympathizers.
Because every sub that goes against their agenda gets false flagged.
Can't confess to something as fictional as Santa Claus.
Never heard of that before for the West, which ones?
I'd be wary of caveats like age difference (e.g. 12 & 14 is vastly different than 12 & 30), or where national consent of age is overrode by state/prefecture laws (e.g. Japan IIRC).