As you may know there have been a variety of background for mass shooters.
A woman shot up google headquarters when youtube demonetized her videos:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/04/nasim-najafi-aghdam-youtube-shooting-demonetisation-payments-father
A trans person shot up their school:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-colorado-shooting/transgender-teen-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-for-deadly-colorado-school-shooting-idUSKCN24Q00D
And there's so many mass shootings in gangland in chicago you can't even list them all out.
But the press likes to push only the ones that meet their man-hating narrative - when the shooter is a white man - like recently:
https://archive.ph/hSkPM
Apparently this is his reddit post history:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210813174435/https://old.reddit.com/user/Jake3572
**Of the last 24 posts he made - 12 of them were to one of reddits protected man-bashing hate subs - **IncelsInAction.
The sub description of itself:
This sub is for mocking the antics of anyone who identifies themselves as "incel." This is a term popularised on Reddit and 4chan meaning "involuntarily celibate" i.e. men who can't get laid. Some of them get really really mad about it, and here are their stories...
...
Incels who comment in here can expect to be relentlessly mocked by this community. If you don't like it, don't post here.
Did reddit's protection of it's anti-male subs contribute to this shooting?
It seems a lot more plausible than the banned "men going their own way" sub.
My point is that you can't call someone a pedophile for doing something that is legal in a Western country. It's absurd that they jump on this argument without any research.
Because Reddit doesn't mark handshake accounts and the nature of incels is to use throwaways in case women try to dox them. It makes it ridiculously easy to false flag, which is the point of them using doxxing. It causes the change in behavior that benefits their strategy.
No, they really are unable to get laid, but they formed a community around that to avoid women's influence. They can't influence anything if their only option is to false flag with throwaways, so they use media and government to get their way.
Who said I'm their victim? I'm just going to repost the list I posted when they said "misogyny" was the motive.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jvytVDkZ/x/c/4JDDSEEc3FR
12 years old is legal in some Western countries. Yes, I will call someone a pedophile for that. Also, the 'Western countries' is something that you added in later on, moving the goalposts from your original "BUT IT IS LEGAL IN THE UK!"
Alright, if one cannot verify the identities of those who are posting, how are you so sure that half are women false flagging?
You're confessing to misogyny now?
Which ones? I don't know of any. Regardless, you're just deliberately skewing the argument. Nobody is condemning the UK for having an age of consent that is too low, so the accusations are nothing more than vile smear tactics, typical of feminists and their sympathizers.
Because every sub that goes against their agenda gets false flagged.
Can't confess to something as fictional as Santa Claus.
So you have no evidence and just make stuff up. OK.
Never heard of that before for the West, which ones?
I'd be wary of caveats like age difference (e.g. 12 & 14 is vastly different than 12 & 30), or where national consent of age is overrode by state/prefecture laws (e.g. Japan IIRC).