Comments (56)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
TerpenoidTester 34 points ago +37 / -3

You guys are picking the wrong target.

She's a victim seeker, if you go after her you give her EXACTLY what she wants and gives her fuel to go on TV.

Go after the editor and periodical who pushed her fake story. Ask why a basic fact check wasn't done, and demand to know who approved a story that is easily proven false.

That's the only way to win here.

CardboardFan [S] 21 points ago +22 / -1

Will that work?

Journalists have lied extensively about Covid19 AND been caught out (it didn't come from a lab/masks work/mask's don't work)

I admit that going after this woman is useless - this woman will pivot and pull the 'i received threats online' faster than jussie smollett.

She'll be on the 'i was bullied online' touring circuit with Anita Sarkeesian pretty soon.

I expect she's already launching her gofundme

ShadistIsACuck 15 points ago +15 / -0

It the consequences actually mattered she wouldn't think that way.

ArtemisFoul 12 points ago +12 / -0

Go after everyone. The hospital too, keep e-mailing them and calling them asking why they employ an obvious psychopath.

Adamrises 10 points ago +10 / -0

Imagine thinking someone looking for victim cred needs to be victimized.

In the lack of proper harassment they will just make it up and no one will question it either. A random nobody, that totally isn't a sock, saying "die bitch" means she now has death threats and is immune to all other questions.

If they've already failed to vet the fact on one story, why wouldn't they a second time?

deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
current_horror 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have to push through these insane dynamics and eventually destroy them. If "muh harassment" and "that's racist" function to shut down debate and discourse forever, then society officially belongs to the sociopaths.