Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

90
()
posted 4 years ago by ChadRudy 4 years ago by ChadRudy +90 / -0
59 comments share
59 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
▲ 9 ▼
– Adamrises 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

If we are sending women to war, we are already demographically fucked.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Knife-TotingRat 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Again, it's about picking and choosing which ones. Same as it more or less is for the men (as there is such a thing for exemptions for guys with very important jobs that pretty much only they can do. My grandfather was one of these, but was also a self-admitted coward who said he'd have made a shitty soldier anyway; he served better where he was, managing parts at Chrysler.) Of course, why the Group Ws get rejected is kind of beyond me, they seem like the ones you'd WANT to send away - you know, the mother killers, father rapers, and litterbugs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Adamrises 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

If we are picking and choosing which ones based on logic and best fit we will send nearly no women to begin with. The very few women who make the cut (without lowering the standards massively just to bump up numbers like we do now) are not worth the cost they bring to unit cohesion, medical requirements, and HR related everything.

I'm not pro-draft for reasons you listed, but at least drafting men has some logical reason even if there is just as much logic against it. Drafting women is a meaningless gesture on top of the already meaningless gesture of letting women be "soldiers."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy