I remember how the iconic picture of a woman being publicly shot by the T-party (for murdering her husband) was used to galvanize support for the wider war instead of just going after AQ and then getting out of there.
I was also dismayed to hear an American general bragging in his "war progress" speach in This Is What Winning Looks Like (which is a quote from his speech) about "schools for girls".
Sometimes TheImp is actually onto things (but he's still not exactly right).
Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA), a women's group.
So, this is the origin of the footage, a very clearly biased and radical feminist group.
They chose to hide all information relating to the reason why she was killed in the hope that the West would fall for it. Of course, we did.
Reporter Anton Antonowicz of The Daily Mirror in London learned the identity of the woman behind the veil, and found out that she had actually been in prison for three years on charges of killing her husband.
I bet it somehow portrays her sympathetically.
She and the oldest daughter conspired together and on that particular night, they took what is either some sleeping tablets or opium — one isn't sure — but they put it in the father's food," Antonowicz said.
Can't even trust your own kids. Wow.
"Zarmina could not do it," Antonowicz said. "Finally it was the daughter who picked up the 10-pound mason's hammer and hit her father once on the head while he was asleep killing him with that single blow."
What is it with fake abuse stories and ending with the woman executing the man with a hammer? The United Femdom's big lie was very similar.
Zarmina never admitted her daughter's role, and no one was looking to champion the cause of a woman in such a predicament.
Things were never going to be good for the women there. A lot of that is on them, they don't want freedoms. Some do, but enough don't that they would be the ones stoning the ones who do.
I remember how the iconic picture of a woman being publicly shot by the T-party (for murdering her husband) was used to galvanize support for the wider war instead of just going after AQ and then getting out of there.
I was also dismayed to hear an American general bragging in his "war progress" speach in This Is What Winning Looks Like (which is a quote from his speech) about "schools for girls".
Sometimes TheImp is actually onto things (but he's still not exactly right).
What.
You're joking. They sent men to die in the desert so women could murder their partners with impunity?
Also I'll give you https://www.voanews.com/south-central-asia/reporter-looks-back-talibans-1994-rise-power
Read until something's guaranteed to blow your mind, before you also inevitably rationalize it in your own peculiar ways.
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=125721
Even the most traditional societies can't control women's homicidal urges.
https://archive.md/NBIX1 - just in case it gets wiped.
So, this is the origin of the footage, a very clearly biased and radical feminist group.
They chose to hide all information relating to the reason why she was killed in the hope that the West would fall for it. Of course, we did.
I bet it somehow portrays her sympathetically.
Can't even trust your own kids. Wow.
What is it with fake abuse stories and ending with the woman executing the man with a hammer? The United Femdom's big lie was very similar.
Nobody fucking should be!
Well, have some real banger just for you from the T-boys band (no girls allowed!):
https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/141543751179136614
Things were never going to be good for the women there. A lot of that is on them, they don't want freedoms. Some do, but enough don't that they would be the ones stoning the ones who do.