The major focus looks to be about abortion on demand and contraceptives and pads for girls. Although no one proved it is an issue in the first place.
Parliament encourages member states to ensure sexuality education is taught comprehensively to primary and secondary school children, as SRHR education can significantly contribute to reducing sexual violence and harassment.
This part needs explanation cause I do not understand how abortion services decrease infant mortality
safe abortion services are important elements in saving women’s lives and reducing infant and child mortality.
I don't think that's the problem. Which is why Le Pen is a great idea. In fact, can we make a bet about how her party voted on this? And how Macron's party voted?
The interesting thing is that you think that women have only one in-group, when there are many, and gender generally the least important of these to people.
Considering one side pretends to be against the EU and one is openly for it, that seems like a stupid bet. Macron's party would vote for anything the EU asked, even if it said add the line "Macron has an Oedipus complex" to the French anthem.
Your mistake is believing that she isn't the same shit and just acting like she won't do that.
There is scientific evidence that women's strongest bias is towards people of the same gender. Color, nationality or religion were weaker bonds.
It's a stupid bet because you would lose yet another one? So how do you justify supporting Macron over Le Pen? It seems to be that regardless of what you dislike, your dislike for wahmen is always greater.
I can't wait for Le Pen to become the first wahmen president of France, if she manages it. All the heads will explode. And yours too.
Based on what is she 'the same shit'? The French are generally pro-EU, so the anti-EU position of Le Pen is the best you're going to get on that.
Quite apart from the fact that with the replication crisis, all the P-hacking and outright fraud that is taking place, I don't accept anything of the social so called sciences as science, I am interested in what your source for this is.
Because as long as he's narrowly in power, he has to do at least some of what the people want instead of solely serving his female masters. If she wins, he will fall off the face of the earth and she will be in an effective one party system, like Boris Johnson. (look how much he sells out for women.)
As well as that, I don't trust her. I never will. Putting her in charge is just trading one female master for another.
I don't particularly like Wikipedia, but even they admit female in group bias exists.
I have never known politicians to do that.
Le Pen is nothing like Boris Johnson, whom you supported.
I was particularly interested in your earlier claim, not what Wikipedia says, that in-group bias regarding gender is stronger than nationality, religion etc.