Nah, blacks in Brazil aren't nearly as entitled as the average black in America. Many supported Bolsonaro. Of course, the elites bemoan this in the news outlets they control, so they definitely do want to spread the poison.
Blacks in Europe have done US-style BLM things.
Mostly England. Outside of that, basically nothing. Our blacks are so much better than your blacks.
You're just plain wrong that nowhere but the US has these problems. Dirt isn't magic. If you had our demographics, you would have our problems.
It's got nothing to do with dirt, and everything with what you teach people. Blacks and whites may differ in a lot of areas, but these are not the cause of your problems. In earlier times, you also did not have these same problems, as we don't have as many problems with our blacks.
Watch out! White people might defend ourselves too hard! Much better to let us to get discriminated against or even wiped out!
No one's wiping you out, but obviously, if people tried, then you could defend yourself, same as anyone. This is hysterical hyperbole same as the claim that blacks are like being genocided and such as by the PO-lees.
So what should we do then? As usual you offer no alternative ideas or solutions. I like how you just do the same thing that Murray is being criticized for.
I have a solution for what I consider the problem but I am not sure for what you consider the problem. If you want advantages for being white, and to get rid of anyone who isn't, then my solutions are not going to get that for you.
"Must be as entitled as American blacks before we're allowed to say it's a problem" is an arbitrary standard you made up for this conversation. Check the murder rate in this country you insist isn't a shitshow.
You keep shifting the goalposts. Brazil may be a 'shitshow', but blacks are not as enthralled to identitarianism as yours are. That was what this was about, your claim that non-whites everywhere are identitarians, when only you and American non-whites are.
You barely have them, and they are skewed toward immigration which meant a selection process. In other words, you don't have the US's demographics.
Our immigrants, and selection? Come on man. They just open the borders and let any absolute cretin in. Bonus points if you are a member of ISIS.
When were these earlier times?
1950s for example.
You dropped this: "let us to get discriminated against."
As I don't think it's a justification for you starting a civil war, yes. But you don't oppose discrimination. You just oppose the allocation of roles. You'd like for blacks to be discriminated against and for whites to be benefited, the opposite of the current situation. And I find it as bad as the current situation.
I mentioned Brazil to show that your example of a "working" diverse country wasn't working at all.
I don't believe diverse countries can work, nor did I claim that. I only pointed out that racial identitarianism is mostly an American thing, and your comeback to that was Brazil, as well as the rare BLM moron in Europe (which are an export from America).
Europe selected its shitty immigrants primarily from MENA, not African blacks.
Loads of African blacks posing as refugees arrive from boats every day. And they are welcomed by the corrupt, criminal political elites. They are not exactly the cream of the crop.
If they had made their way to Europe in large numbers, you wouldn't even have this absurd talking point.
A lot of colonial powers, like French and England, have blacks who are generally fine. Certainly no comparison to yours. Why? Because we have not taught them that they deserve the world on account of being black.
When whites had a strong in group bias and enforced segregation, LMAO.
How exactly does this refute the counterpoint to your claim that it is impossible for blacks to behave, when clearly it is possible?
Why the fuck are you citing the 1950s as a period of good race relations then?
I did not mention race relations at all. I only pointed out that blacks back then behaved.Too bad you couldn't dismantle discrimination against blacks without going overboard into another extreme. America can't get anything right.
Oh wait, people have been quoting MLK at the POCs for the last half century. They don't give a fuck
Except that your pure whites who are liberals are far more likely to believe in 'racial liberalism' than even blacks. Every ethnic group voted against Proposition 16, except for blacks, and even among blacks a significant minority voted against it. And that was in California. If they cannot get support in California, from ethnic minorities, where can they get support?
You don't even care about what you purport to claim about. What you seem to want is to receive unfair advantages the way blacks receive now. And that is quite contemptible.
Nah, blacks in Brazil aren't nearly as entitled as the average black in America. Many supported Bolsonaro. Of course, the elites bemoan this in the news outlets they control, so they definitely do want to spread the poison.
Mostly England. Outside of that, basically nothing. Our blacks are so much better than your blacks.
It's got nothing to do with dirt, and everything with what you teach people. Blacks and whites may differ in a lot of areas, but these are not the cause of your problems. In earlier times, you also did not have these same problems, as we don't have as many problems with our blacks.
No one's wiping you out, but obviously, if people tried, then you could defend yourself, same as anyone. This is hysterical hyperbole same as the claim that blacks are like being genocided and such as by the PO-lees.
I have a solution for what I consider the problem but I am not sure for what you consider the problem. If you want advantages for being white, and to get rid of anyone who isn't, then my solutions are not going to get that for you.
You keep shifting the goalposts. Brazil may be a 'shitshow', but blacks are not as enthralled to identitarianism as yours are. That was what this was about, your claim that non-whites everywhere are identitarians, when only you and American non-whites are.
Our immigrants, and selection? Come on man. They just open the borders and let any absolute cretin in. Bonus points if you are a member of ISIS.
1950s for example.
As I don't think it's a justification for you starting a civil war, yes. But you don't oppose discrimination. You just oppose the allocation of roles. You'd like for blacks to be discriminated against and for whites to be benefited, the opposite of the current situation. And I find it as bad as the current situation.
Stop identitarianism.
I don't believe diverse countries can work, nor did I claim that. I only pointed out that racial identitarianism is mostly an American thing, and your comeback to that was Brazil, as well as the rare BLM moron in Europe (which are an export from America).
Loads of African blacks posing as refugees arrive from boats every day. And they are welcomed by the corrupt, criminal political elites. They are not exactly the cream of the crop.
A lot of colonial powers, like French and England, have blacks who are generally fine. Certainly no comparison to yours. Why? Because we have not taught them that they deserve the world on account of being black.
How exactly does this refute the counterpoint to your claim that it is impossible for blacks to behave, when clearly it is possible?
I did not mention race relations at all. I only pointed out that blacks back then behaved.Too bad you couldn't dismantle discrimination against blacks without going overboard into another extreme. America can't get anything right.
Except that your pure whites who are liberals are far more likely to believe in 'racial liberalism' than even blacks. Every ethnic group voted against Proposition 16, except for blacks, and even among blacks a significant minority voted against it. And that was in California. If they cannot get support in California, from ethnic minorities, where can they get support?
You don't even care about what you purport to claim about. What you seem to want is to receive unfair advantages the way blacks receive now. And that is quite contemptible.