Let's ask the shaboz on the previous OP, they're really defensive and pushing that CRT is ahistorical instead of anti-white, which raises red flags to me. I wonder what they're up to.
If you're going to sugarcoat the truth, you might as well lie. If you're going to dumb down the truth, you might as well as say nothing. Is the optics worth more than the truth?
Yeah I have to agree. “They won’t listen if you speak the truth!”. What else am I supposed to do? All I can do is let them suffer and die in ignorance. The people who are open to the truth will receive it. The others weren’t worth the time you wasted talking to them.
Telling the truth is one way, but the most effective way is also the hardest. You've got to get them to start questioning what they've been told themselves.
I still vote for telling the truth above all, because getting caught in a lie is a good way to make sure they ignore you in the future.
Not everyone is ready for the truth at all times. Sometimes what you said to someone may only resonate years down the road.
I used to feel like I had to get people to agree with the truth just because it's factual. Like maybe if I approach the argument a different way or point out errors in some of the things they are saying, they would have to accept that they were wrong. (because that's how I am)
I had to learn that you can't get people to do things they don't want to do if they aren't ready to do them. Some people are stubborn and will have to find out in their own time.
We need to break through this particular wall. Muh optics eventually march you into the same grave. It's time to simply call it like it is and refuse to apologise or dissemble. CRT is anti-white.
Frankly I think there's merit to having people working both angles. Not everyone can process the truth all at once, so you also want some people out there who can drip feed people the truth over time to allow them to come around eventually. I agree that putting the truth out in the open directly should be the goal, but we shouldn't write off a more gradual approach in cases where it is more effective.
Reminds me of the great Norm McDonald's tweet about how if Muslims blew up a major American city and killed millions of people, our primary concern would be the islamophobia that follows.
This is why men should never listen to women. It’s all about emotion, optics. “Those are some really bad people!” Really? What did they do? Say things that made you uncomfortable? Get over yourself.
everyone who believes that critical race theory is anti-white are aligned with some REALLY bad people.
When the alternative is watching a slow motion genocide of your people through the deliberate imposition of laws and conditions calculated to reduce the birth rate and expropriate your resources, it really doesn't matter who you are aligned with. You align with anyone and everyone who will help your people and culture survive.
How can anyone dispute that this stuff is anti-white at this stage of the game?
Let's ask the shaboz on the previous OP, they're really defensive and pushing that CRT is ahistorical instead of anti-white, which raises red flags to me. I wonder what they're up to.
If you're going to sugarcoat the truth, you might as well lie. If you're going to dumb down the truth, you might as well as say nothing. Is the optics worth more than the truth?
Yeah I have to agree. “They won’t listen if you speak the truth!”. What else am I supposed to do? All I can do is let them suffer and die in ignorance. The people who are open to the truth will receive it. The others weren’t worth the time you wasted talking to them.
Telling the truth is one way, but the most effective way is also the hardest. You've got to get them to start questioning what they've been told themselves.
I still vote for telling the truth above all, because getting caught in a lie is a good way to make sure they ignore you in the future.
Not everyone is ready for the truth at all times. Sometimes what you said to someone may only resonate years down the road.
I used to feel like I had to get people to agree with the truth just because it's factual. Like maybe if I approach the argument a different way or point out errors in some of the things they are saying, they would have to accept that they were wrong. (because that's how I am)
I had to learn that you can't get people to do things they don't want to do if they aren't ready to do them. Some people are stubborn and will have to find out in their own time.
We need to break through this particular wall. Muh optics eventually march you into the same grave. It's time to simply call it like it is and refuse to apologise or dissemble. CRT is anti-white.
Frankly I think there's merit to having people working both angles. Not everyone can process the truth all at once, so you also want some people out there who can drip feed people the truth over time to allow them to come around eventually. I agree that putting the truth out in the open directly should be the goal, but we shouldn't write off a more gradual approach in cases where it is more effective.
Reminds me of the great Norm McDonald's tweet about how if Muslims blew up a major American city and killed millions of people, our primary concern would be the islamophobia that follows.
This is why men should never listen to women. It’s all about emotion, optics. “Those are some really bad people!” Really? What did they do? Say things that made you uncomfortable? Get over yourself.
The bitch smells like matzo and controlled opposition.
The UK recently banned this CRT poison - because it is clearly racist.
This woman is pissing on your leg and saying its raining
When the alternative is watching a slow motion genocide of your people through the deliberate imposition of laws and conditions calculated to reduce the birth rate and expropriate your resources, it really doesn't matter who you are aligned with. You align with anyone and everyone who will help your people and culture survive.