Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

126
Imagine if engineers were discussing strength of materials and fracture mechanics, then some kid w/ no experience flagged the discussion as “dangerous”- this is the medical equivalent of what Twitter is doing. (twitter.com)
posted 4 years ago by YesMovement 4 years ago by YesMovement +126 / -0
19 comments share
19 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– DeclineOfTheWest 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Oh, it’s pretty simple:

We titanic had a sister ship call the Olympic. But the latter was in cruddy condition (This is off the top of my head, so I don’t remember whether it was repaired badly or just built badly), so the conspiracy goes that the names on the two ships were deliberately switched because the owners knew the Olympic was not seaworthy and the iceberg was just a cover to justify it sinking and collect the insurance money.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– LauriThorne 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

The real reason is that they ran out of rivets and instead of delaying they bought cheaper lower quality rivets.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– APDSmith 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

The "real" reason, if there even is a single one, is the regulations of the time.

Ships in the era of the Titanic were physically much larger than they had been a generation before, and regulations hadn't yet caught up to what that meant for seaworthiness - as an example, one of the older-generation ships had struck an iceberg a decade or so before the Titanic's fateful voyage. You've not heard about it because this ship, with proportionately much thicker hull plating compared to the mass of the ship and a different shape that kept the impact away from the waterline, essentially bounced off without major damage.

Titanic, with her vast mass - 50,000 tonnes, more than double the size of the White Star liners commissioned only ten years earlier - slammed her flat sides into the iceberg, and her hull, while thicker than that of her earlier sisters, was still only 3/4 of an inch plate, driven into the iceberg with 50,000t of force behind it.

Regulations of the time were written with collisions between ships in mind, one driving bow-first into another somehow. The ship that rammed the other, per regulation, would stay afloat due to the strong bow bulkheads designed for this, and, if the damage to the other ship was significant enough to risk that vessel, both ships would combine their lifeboat flotillas to transfer passengers over to the ship with the damaged bow, which, thanks to the collision bulkhead, would still be seaworthy.

That's why Titanic was short on lifeboats, and why she was incapable of dealing with having a section of her side carved away.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– APDSmith 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Not sure I can figure how, in this scenario, the just-launched Titanic magics over the Atlantic to New York to take Olympic's place...

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy