17 Years Ago Today: "I was always willing to be reasonable until I had to be unreasonable"
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
Didn't know we had BLM supporting morons here.
Do you know his story? Those werent random buildings he targeted.
Then that is what you should have said, instead of "hehehe, he only destroyed property so it's OK" like a BLM supporter.
I assumed everyone here knew his story already.
Whether they did or not has no impact on what you said.
If you're saying now that this property destruction was justified because of the very specific circumstances, which you did not earlier, then I don't mind. However, what you said in your first comment is that it doesn't matter because it's just property destruction, and that is a BLM-tier argument, which I am glad to see you do not actually believe.
Shut the ever-loving fuck up, Tony. Jesus Christ.
I don't have the habit of shutting up when people don't like what I have to say.
I am beginning to see why you used to get along so well with the KIAPrime mods. You act just like them when you want to be obnoxious.
He's still a leftist at heart.
Go ahead. But how is it that the very same opinion that gets you labeled a 'racist' by BLM makes you a 'leftist at heart' by Stormfags?
Probably because of the excessive faggotry of your opinion.
Only some of them.
Maybe, but in this case the point was not even to be obnoxious. Also, I was completely right. It sounded exactly like BLM apologia.
Most importantly, one of the most hated ones.
Sorry lets put it in a way you seem to think is valid.
Sounds like you're a SJW tumor. Since you seem to think just labelling people you don't like with heavy labels is a good way to make a point.
You'd fit right in with them, using your complete ignorance of the topic and homing in on one specific word devoid of context to attack someone.
Shadi? Well, he hated me as well, and then he suddenly liked me, and then he suddenly hated me again.
I think it's quite a good thing to hold up a mirror to people.
Whether I am completely ignorant of the topic or not is not really the issue here. It in no way invalidates my original point. That entire comment could be lifted and posted in a different thread about BLM. Vapid appeals to 'context' are usually just special pleading, as they seem to be in this case.
Like I told the other guy, what I objected to was the unconditional approval of property destruction as 'just' being about property. That is unacceptable. He later said that he didn't mean it that way, and that was more acceptable.