They pretend to be male because they bought their own BS about "male privilege" then realize "Wow, we made being a man so shitty...I want to go back."
Dr. Money was also a man. You can't claim he had no freaking agency, but was both the evil mastermind and also the unknowing, mislead puppet of the evil women.
The guy was a pedophile. He was a puppet because they covered for his child raping fantasies. He eagerly did what they wanted in exchange for not being exposed.
It's weird how women's groups are full of pedophiles. MeToo was led by a child rapist as well.
A bunch of them didn't actually go back. If I remember correctly, most of the ones mentioned in the book did not. The book was mostly about the fact that at this point, they can't, because they got things done too fast and they can't just be turned back.
So why is it that women are the ones to blame when a male pedophile does male pedophile things?
This is something I don't understand about your logic. You somehow visualise women being evil behind every single thing happening, even when men do it, just with the added element of "but women made him do it".
You diminish the evil of certain people if they were male, so you can blame women for it all.
Do you think he wouldn't have been a pedophile on his own?
The gay community also has an insane amount of pedophiles. Men who are 100% not interested in women. How is that women's fault?
This is something I don't understand about your logic. You somehow visualise women being evil behind every single thing happening, even when men do it, just with the added element of "but women made him do it".
There is an easy psychological answer to this question. Why would someone, presumably a man, think that when other men do something evil it was women who made him do it?
So why is it that women are the ones to blame when a male pedophile does male pedophile things?
That's not what I said. I said that women took advantage of his pedo tendencies to make him push their agenda. They chose not to expose him because it was more useful to them to have him give their "men are defective women" agenda fuel.
You diminish the evil of certain people if they were male, so you can blame women for it all.
I blame women for exploiting what he was, instead of exposing it. Would you really consider it okay if someone did that for what you stand for? "Bill Gates is a pedophile, but we'll cover for him if he backs us in the culture war?" Is that okay to you?
Of course it isn't okay. But like this was a person who was smart and put-together enough to work his way up in academia. He isn't some half-crazed, foaming at the mouth beast that has a handler. This guy knew what he was doing and he was going to do it no matter what.
It's not like he was an absolute nothing basement-dwelling Chr is Chan who got artificially elevated regardless of what or who he was.
There is literally no information or evidence that can be put in front of you that will cause you to even hesitate in your stance, which is how we can identify that your views are not rooted in reality. Everyone should ignore you or mock you for it.
The tradcuck telling me that I'm not rooted in reality
The guy whose beliefs preserved humanity for 250,000 years tells genetic dead end that he is not rooted in reality. Sounds right to me. Anyone who had your beliefs, has been weeded out by history by failing to reproduce, as you will be in this generation. We will all be the better for it.
I mean, it's because of people like him that we're in the shit we're in.
You can screech about biology all you want, but you can't deny the fact that without tradcuck bullshit, we wouldn't even be listening to their genocidal rants, because they would be treated like everyone else instead of their outrageously inflated value.
They pretend to be male because they bought their own BS about "male privilege" then realize "Wow, we made being a man so shitty...I want to go back."
The guy was a pedophile. He was a puppet because they covered for his child raping fantasies. He eagerly did what they wanted in exchange for not being exposed.
It's weird how women's groups are full of pedophiles. MeToo was led by a child rapist as well.
A bunch of them didn't actually go back. If I remember correctly, most of the ones mentioned in the book did not. The book was mostly about the fact that at this point, they can't, because they got things done too fast and they can't just be turned back.
So why is it that women are the ones to blame when a male pedophile does male pedophile things?
This is something I don't understand about your logic. You somehow visualise women being evil behind every single thing happening, even when men do it, just with the added element of "but women made him do it".
You diminish the evil of certain people if they were male, so you can blame women for it all.
Do you think he wouldn't have been a pedophile on his own?
The gay community also has an insane amount of pedophiles. Men who are 100% not interested in women. How is that women's fault?
There is an easy psychological answer to this question. Why would someone, presumably a man, think that when other men do something evil it was women who made him do it?
That's not what I said. I said that women took advantage of his pedo tendencies to make him push their agenda. They chose not to expose him because it was more useful to them to have him give their "men are defective women" agenda fuel.
I blame women for exploiting what he was, instead of exposing it. Would you really consider it okay if someone did that for what you stand for? "Bill Gates is a pedophile, but we'll cover for him if he backs us in the culture war?" Is that okay to you?
Of course it isn't okay. But like this was a person who was smart and put-together enough to work his way up in academia. He isn't some half-crazed, foaming at the mouth beast that has a handler. This guy knew what he was doing and he was going to do it no matter what.
It's not like he was an absolute nothing basement-dwelling Chr is Chan who got artificially elevated regardless of what or who he was.
You're not engaging with a sane human being. He should be mercilessly mocked or ignored and little else.
There is literally no information or evidence that can be put in front of you that will cause you to even hesitate in your stance, which is how we can identify that your views are not rooted in reality. Everyone should ignore you or mock you for it.
The tradcuck telling me that I'm not rooted in reality is peak meme potential.
Sir, we moved past the 1950s. Their true colors are more obvious than the 2020 election being stolen.
Are you really denying that they use blackmail (of both real and fictional events) to make sure their narratives win? Have you been asleep since 2016?
The guy whose beliefs preserved humanity for 250,000 years tells genetic dead end that he is not rooted in reality. Sounds right to me. Anyone who had your beliefs, has been weeded out by history by failing to reproduce, as you will be in this generation. We will all be the better for it.
I mean, it's because of people like him that we're in the shit we're in.
You can screech about biology all you want, but you can't deny the fact that without tradcuck bullshit, we wouldn't even be listening to their genocidal rants, because they would be treated like everyone else instead of their outrageously inflated value.