A bunch of them didn't actually go back. If I remember correctly, most of the ones mentioned in the book did not. The book was mostly about the fact that at this point, they can't, because they got things done too fast and they can't just be turned back.
So why is it that women are the ones to blame when a male pedophile does male pedophile things?
This is something I don't understand about your logic. You somehow visualise women being evil behind every single thing happening, even when men do it, just with the added element of "but women made him do it".
You diminish the evil of certain people if they were male, so you can blame women for it all.
Do you think he wouldn't have been a pedophile on his own?
The gay community also has an insane amount of pedophiles. Men who are 100% not interested in women. How is that women's fault?
This is something I don't understand about your logic. You somehow visualise women being evil behind every single thing happening, even when men do it, just with the added element of "but women made him do it".
There is an easy psychological answer to this question. Why would someone, presumably a man, think that when other men do something evil it was women who made him do it?
So why is it that women are the ones to blame when a male pedophile does male pedophile things?
That's not what I said. I said that women took advantage of his pedo tendencies to make him push their agenda. They chose not to expose him because it was more useful to them to have him give their "men are defective women" agenda fuel.
You diminish the evil of certain people if they were male, so you can blame women for it all.
I blame women for exploiting what he was, instead of exposing it. Would you really consider it okay if someone did that for what you stand for? "Bill Gates is a pedophile, but we'll cover for him if he backs us in the culture war?" Is that okay to you?
Of course it isn't okay. But like this was a person who was smart and put-together enough to work his way up in academia. He isn't some half-crazed, foaming at the mouth beast that has a handler. This guy knew what he was doing and he was going to do it no matter what.
It's not like he was an absolute nothing basement-dwelling Chr is Chan who got artificially elevated regardless of what or who he was.
A bunch of them didn't actually go back. If I remember correctly, most of the ones mentioned in the book did not. The book was mostly about the fact that at this point, they can't, because they got things done too fast and they can't just be turned back.
So why is it that women are the ones to blame when a male pedophile does male pedophile things?
This is something I don't understand about your logic. You somehow visualise women being evil behind every single thing happening, even when men do it, just with the added element of "but women made him do it".
You diminish the evil of certain people if they were male, so you can blame women for it all.
Do you think he wouldn't have been a pedophile on his own?
The gay community also has an insane amount of pedophiles. Men who are 100% not interested in women. How is that women's fault?
There is an easy psychological answer to this question. Why would someone, presumably a man, think that when other men do something evil it was women who made him do it?
That's not what I said. I said that women took advantage of his pedo tendencies to make him push their agenda. They chose not to expose him because it was more useful to them to have him give their "men are defective women" agenda fuel.
I blame women for exploiting what he was, instead of exposing it. Would you really consider it okay if someone did that for what you stand for? "Bill Gates is a pedophile, but we'll cover for him if he backs us in the culture war?" Is that okay to you?
Of course it isn't okay. But like this was a person who was smart and put-together enough to work his way up in academia. He isn't some half-crazed, foaming at the mouth beast that has a handler. This guy knew what he was doing and he was going to do it no matter what.
It's not like he was an absolute nothing basement-dwelling Chr is Chan who got artificially elevated regardless of what or who he was.
You're not engaging with a sane human being. He should be mercilessly mocked or ignored and little else.