I read this book last year, because I was genuinely curious. It talks more about the narrative around transgenderism than judging it. It definitely does not incite violence or hate, it's about things like Youtubers selling it as this all-curing things. Coaching kids on what to say to get hormones fast. The absolute batshit facts like using hormones without a concrete end game and judging the effectiveness on... the person's looks. Hormones, that influence function, but all they do is look at if the girl got enough facial hair to her liking and if she likes her voice.
Many of the points it brings up are super interesting. Like some doctor, who claims mastectomies on young girl are okay, because they can just go get implants if they change their minds. Which is interesting, knowing the increasing talk about Breast Implant Illness.
The transgender lobby is a cult and I am 1000% sure it's rooted in some very sick fetish for children.
This specific book is actually more about girls, often mentally and physically ill ones, pretending to be male to kind of "avoid" their problems. Like they think their issues fitting in stem from being born in the wrong body, instead of things like motor skill issues and autism.
I don't necessarily agree with you. In some cases, sure. But I would also consider avoidance of your problems in both directions. This explains why often they have criminal histories and serious problems before transitioning. They believe this gives them a whole new start. Oh, you beat your children or raped someone before? No, that was someone else, you are a new person.
Also, sexual fetishes. Look at grown men who dress and act like their idea of cute young girls and women dressing and behaving like barely pubescent boys. It's absolutely sexual fetishism, it doesn't show an actual picture of the opposite gender, but a highly fetishised one.
Dr. Money was also a man. You can't claim he had no freaking agency, but was both the evil mastermind and also the unknowing, mislead puppet of the evil women.
They pretend to be male because they bought their own BS about "male privilege" then realize "Wow, we made being a man so shitty...I want to go back."
Dr. Money was also a man. You can't claim he had no freaking agency, but was both the evil mastermind and also the unknowing, mislead puppet of the evil women.
The guy was a pedophile. He was a puppet because they covered for his child raping fantasies. He eagerly did what they wanted in exchange for not being exposed.
It's weird how women's groups are full of pedophiles. MeToo was led by a child rapist as well.
A bunch of them didn't actually go back. If I remember correctly, most of the ones mentioned in the book did not. The book was mostly about the fact that at this point, they can't, because they got things done too fast and they can't just be turned back.
So why is it that women are the ones to blame when a male pedophile does male pedophile things?
This is something I don't understand about your logic. You somehow visualise women being evil behind every single thing happening, even when men do it, just with the added element of "but women made him do it".
You diminish the evil of certain people if they were male, so you can blame women for it all.
Do you think he wouldn't have been a pedophile on his own?
The gay community also has an insane amount of pedophiles. Men who are 100% not interested in women. How is that women's fault?
There is literally no information or evidence that can be put in front of you that will cause you to even hesitate in your stance, which is how we can identify that your views are not rooted in reality. Everyone should ignore you or mock you for it.
I read this book last year, because I was genuinely curious. It talks more about the narrative around transgenderism than judging it. It definitely does not incite violence or hate, it's about things like Youtubers selling it as this all-curing things. Coaching kids on what to say to get hormones fast. The absolute batshit facts like using hormones without a concrete end game and judging the effectiveness on... the person's looks. Hormones, that influence function, but all they do is look at if the girl got enough facial hair to her liking and if she likes her voice.
Many of the points it brings up are super interesting. Like some doctor, who claims mastectomies on young girl are okay, because they can just go get implants if they change their minds. Which is interesting, knowing the increasing talk about Breast Implant Illness.
The transgender lobby is a cult and I am 1000% sure it's rooted in some very sick fetish for children.
We both know transgenderism is rooted in the belief that men are defective women.
Don't try and deny it. Women's groups funded and supported Dr Money.
This specific book is actually more about girls, often mentally and physically ill ones, pretending to be male to kind of "avoid" their problems. Like they think their issues fitting in stem from being born in the wrong body, instead of things like motor skill issues and autism.
I don't necessarily agree with you. In some cases, sure. But I would also consider avoidance of your problems in both directions. This explains why often they have criminal histories and serious problems before transitioning. They believe this gives them a whole new start. Oh, you beat your children or raped someone before? No, that was someone else, you are a new person.
Also, sexual fetishes. Look at grown men who dress and act like their idea of cute young girls and women dressing and behaving like barely pubescent boys. It's absolutely sexual fetishism, it doesn't show an actual picture of the opposite gender, but a highly fetishised one.
Dr. Money was also a man. You can't claim he had no freaking agency, but was both the evil mastermind and also the unknowing, mislead puppet of the evil women.
They pretend to be male because they bought their own BS about "male privilege" then realize "Wow, we made being a man so shitty...I want to go back."
The guy was a pedophile. He was a puppet because they covered for his child raping fantasies. He eagerly did what they wanted in exchange for not being exposed.
It's weird how women's groups are full of pedophiles. MeToo was led by a child rapist as well.
A bunch of them didn't actually go back. If I remember correctly, most of the ones mentioned in the book did not. The book was mostly about the fact that at this point, they can't, because they got things done too fast and they can't just be turned back.
So why is it that women are the ones to blame when a male pedophile does male pedophile things?
This is something I don't understand about your logic. You somehow visualise women being evil behind every single thing happening, even when men do it, just with the added element of "but women made him do it".
You diminish the evil of certain people if they were male, so you can blame women for it all.
Do you think he wouldn't have been a pedophile on his own?
The gay community also has an insane amount of pedophiles. Men who are 100% not interested in women. How is that women's fault?
There is literally no information or evidence that can be put in front of you that will cause you to even hesitate in your stance, which is how we can identify that your views are not rooted in reality. Everyone should ignore you or mock you for it.