I've been seeing this for a long while going through the works of Jose Rizal and people here in the Philippines believes it, that if it wasn't for the United States of America and it's "oppressive" treatment of blacks, there wouldn't be racism in the world.
So who wrote and propagated this narrative, when and on what publication? Help me to dig deep into this.
nobody really cares who first uttered the word, it's just obvious to anyone with two braincells to rub together that the word and idea is purely a tool for commies to fall back on when everything else fails.
my idea makes no realistic, spiritual, economic, physical sense?
well, you're racist! take that!
It sure looked like he did.
Correct. Just like 'commie' is a tool for other idiots (like OP, who lied and then did not want to admit it) when all else fails.
cool cool. how is that a tool when it's true? every cultural, philosophical, economic, political retardation of today can cleanly be traced back to communist roots.
Cause he called someone a commie for debunking him. How are you incapable of getting this?
someone who goes to many lengths to defend what may be the most retarded, useless and well-poisoning term in the modern world is probably some form or other of commie. he wasn't wrong.
even if one is theoretically wrong on the pedantry of where it was F I R S T used it is undeniable that it, in history and today, served and serves as the perfect tool for genuine commies to just fuck up everything and gather all midwits to their anti-racist cause. to set on a quest to debooonk its exact pinpoint origins clearly shows that you don't care for the reality of its use and only for debooooonking.
how are you incapable of getting this? do things just not connect?