The rank and file guarded the Japanes concentration camps, fired on students and left their morals at the door while working with bacha bazi practitioners in Afghanistan. If they can tolerate institutionalized child rape what makes you think they won't tolerate some other bullshit?
Alright, the rest is bad, not disputing that. But considering how frequently those students were Communist or Communist-friendly and degenerate rioters, who included such luminaries as the Weathermen and the guys who got Ethnic Studies (IOW, shit like Afrocentrism) established institutionally, and in general were among those most responsible for the current woke state of affairs. And nobody talks about how the day before Kent State, the most infamous shooting of students by US troops, left-wing radicals burned down the ROTC building on campus.
Sure looks to me like the only problem was that the National Guard and cops didn't kill nearly enough of the verminous brats. Perhaps if they had - if monsters like Bill Ayers, Susan Rosenberg and Bernardine Dohrn had been taken for a one-way helicopter trip instead of being allowed to not only live but infect society even further - America wouldn't be having the problems it does now.
PLUS those "students" were chucking rocks at the Nat Guardmen who were basically straight out of basic and got lost on the campus then surrounded. The powers in the shadows wanted that confrontation for a narrative.....it was the proto Jan 6th moment.
Ah, well, in that case I'd have thought the feds already crossed that line with Ruby Ridge long before Ashli Babbitt. The Weavers objectively did way less than the '''''protesters'''' of the 1960s and still managed to get a fed death squad sent their way, after all.
Yes. However, my point wasn't the morality of the action but the fact that "the rank and file" will almost certainly open fire on a group of peaceful^^TM protesters when put in the right circumstances - which I absolutely trust the powers that be to manufacture.
How is it then that mostly working class troops have often sat in their barracks and not lifted a finger to save incompetent elites from an angry mob? I do think culture plays a part here, and American culture isn't quite as mindlessly socially obedient as Imperial Japan.
Rank and file won't be. And that's what's important as the French nobles found out in 1789.
The rank and file guarded the Japanes concentration camps, fired on students and left their morals at the door while working with bacha bazi practitioners in Afghanistan. If they can tolerate institutionalized child rape what makes you think they won't tolerate some other bullshit?
Alright, the rest is bad, not disputing that. But considering how frequently those students were Communist or Communist-friendly and degenerate rioters, who included such luminaries as the Weathermen and the guys who got Ethnic Studies (IOW, shit like Afrocentrism) established institutionally, and in general were among those most responsible for the current woke state of affairs. And nobody talks about how the day before Kent State, the most infamous shooting of students by US troops, left-wing radicals burned down the ROTC building on campus.
Sure looks to me like the only problem was that the National Guard and cops didn't kill nearly enough of the verminous brats. Perhaps if they had - if monsters like Bill Ayers, Susan Rosenberg and Bernardine Dohrn had been taken for a one-way helicopter trip instead of being allowed to not only live but infect society even further - America wouldn't be having the problems it does now.
Oh I'm not saying they didn't deserve it.
But I am saying that there's a very small step between soldiers firing on one group of "your own people" and firing at another.
PLUS those "students" were chucking rocks at the Nat Guardmen who were basically straight out of basic and got lost on the campus then surrounded. The powers in the shadows wanted that confrontation for a narrative.....it was the proto Jan 6th moment.
Ah, well, in that case I'd have thought the feds already crossed that line with Ruby Ridge long before Ashli Babbitt. The Weavers objectively did way less than the '''''protesters'''' of the 1960s and still managed to get a fed death squad sent their way, after all.
The Boston Massacre was the original Kent State and the soldiers were justified both times. Don't mob armed soldiers if you aren't ready to get shot.
Yes. However, my point wasn't the morality of the action but the fact that "the rank and file" will almost certainly open fire on a group of peaceful^^TM protesters when put in the right circumstances - which I absolutely trust the powers that be to manufacture.
How is it then that mostly working class troops have often sat in their barracks and not lifted a finger to save incompetent elites from an angry mob? I do think culture plays a part here, and American culture isn't quite as mindlessly socially obedient as Imperial Japan.