The only time I've ever heard anybody talk about how much they like meat is in response to when some vegan dipshit starts running their mouth. And nobody thinks it's a "virtue" to eat meat, it's just an enjoyable thing to do, so calling it "virtue signaling" doesn't even make sense.
The closest you might be able to describe it as "virtue signaling" is to let other people know that you're also annoyed by judgmental assholes bloviating about their virtuous diets.
If you look just above that, I was responding to "only time I've ever heard anybody talk about how much they like meat," not about virtue signalling.
You're right. Sorry about that.
The rest of the behaviors you mentioned, including the quotes of other people in this thread, are just things that you find objectionable. They're not virtue signalling. Virtue signalling has a clear definition. Someone bringing up how their diet is better because they enjoy meat, or it's healthier, may be annoying, but is not virtue signalling. Someone bringing up their diet in a conversation, unsolicited, to tell you about how it's better for the environment, is. Someone talking shit about vegans or making sweeping generalizations about them, may be an asshole, but is not virtue signalling.
People need to take the fucking chips off their shoulders. Not everyone is judging you. The idea that people made a life choice for themselves isn't somehow an attack on everyone else. If someone goes to the gym 4 times a week, that isn't an attack on everyone who doesn't.
Sure, I agree. Except that most people here have become wary of "tolerance" as a Trojan Horse for authoritarians to get their foot in the door and later impose their morals and laws on other people.
Furthermore, if a behavior is deemed to be harmful (such as in this case - veganism that lead to animal abuse, ironically one of the things it's supposed to solve), people are going to criticize it. This thread wasn't a case of "hey guys I REALLY FUCKING HATE VEGANS HERE'S MY BLOGPOST", it was a reaction to an event about how veganism almost killed some puppies.
And for what it's worth, I really don't agree with the sweeping generalizations here and I think lots of people here just enjoy making shallow generalizations about groups they dislike.
Most people, including most vegans, just want to live their lives, put only what they want in their mouths, and just generally do their own thing and not be judged, the same as most people here.
Maybe, except you never see this people. Most vegans are those who lecture everyone on how they are killing the planet and you are a monster for eating Bambi or something.
The reason people do not like vegans is that they act like assholes. As for the soy thing, soy men look kind of bad, the skinny with men boobs look is just not a good look. That and it does contain estrogen, is obviously not as potent as hormones produced by the body but men boobs + estrogen makes for a good laugh.
How many times have you seen a conversation where only people who eat meat are talking about how much they hate vegans, for all the judging that vegans do
This is totally fine in my book, if vegans act like assholes then we should be able to talk about how they are assholes or hypocrites.
The whole "soy-" thing is a virtue signal for eating meat.
No, it's a joke against someone virtue signalling eating vegan. It also functions as a multi-layered joke against Leftists for being so predictable. But it doesn't actually virtue signal for anything, which is the crucial component for virtue signalling.
Big difference between dragging something down and laughing at it and propping something else up and displaying yourself.
The only time I've ever heard anybody talk about how much they like meat is in response to when some vegan dipshit starts running their mouth. And nobody thinks it's a "virtue" to eat meat, it's just an enjoyable thing to do, so calling it "virtue signaling" doesn't even make sense.
The closest you might be able to describe it as "virtue signaling" is to let other people know that you're also annoyed by judgmental assholes bloviating about their virtuous diets.
I appreciate that you're making an effort to argue your point in good faith, but
that's not virtue signalling
neither is that
nor that. are you sure you know the meaning of this term?
You're right. Sorry about that.
The rest of the behaviors you mentioned, including the quotes of other people in this thread, are just things that you find objectionable. They're not virtue signalling. Virtue signalling has a clear definition. Someone bringing up how their diet is better because they enjoy meat, or it's healthier, may be annoying, but is not virtue signalling. Someone bringing up their diet in a conversation, unsolicited, to tell you about how it's better for the environment, is. Someone talking shit about vegans or making sweeping generalizations about them, may be an asshole, but is not virtue signalling.
Sure, I agree. Except that most people here have become wary of "tolerance" as a Trojan Horse for authoritarians to get their foot in the door and later impose their morals and laws on other people.
Furthermore, if a behavior is deemed to be harmful (such as in this case - veganism that lead to animal abuse, ironically one of the things it's supposed to solve), people are going to criticize it. This thread wasn't a case of "hey guys I REALLY FUCKING HATE VEGANS HERE'S MY BLOGPOST", it was a reaction to an event about how veganism almost killed some puppies.
And for what it's worth, I really don't agree with the sweeping generalizations here and I think lots of people here just enjoy making shallow generalizations about groups they dislike.
Maybe, except you never see this people. Most vegans are those who lecture everyone on how they are killing the planet and you are a monster for eating Bambi or something.
The reason people do not like vegans is that they act like assholes. As for the soy thing, soy men look kind of bad, the skinny with men boobs look is just not a good look. That and it does contain estrogen, is obviously not as potent as hormones produced by the body but men boobs + estrogen makes for a good laugh.
This is totally fine in my book, if vegans act like assholes then we should be able to talk about how they are assholes or hypocrites.
No, it's a joke against someone virtue signalling eating vegan. It also functions as a multi-layered joke against Leftists for being so predictable. But it doesn't actually virtue signal for anything, which is the crucial component for virtue signalling.
Big difference between dragging something down and laughing at it and propping something else up and displaying yourself.