I've had this going through my head for a while, but I couldn't quite articulate why I had this feeling that it shouldn't be taken at face value.
I think I worked it out. Women's groups are worried that their privileges will be on the chopping block and rolled out the most absurd thing they could in a desperate attempt to rally people behind defending them, on the day where everyone thinks about the most and usually only positive female influence they have in their lives.
It's a cheap trick, the typical appeal to emotion that they're so famous for. You're thinking of the woman that likely you have a deep connection to, so you think "I don't want her to be called a birthing person, she's my mother" and back whatever retarded bullshit Defending Female Privilege Bill 42069 contains.
Not me. I support trannies getting into fights with these feminists over vajayjay havin morons.
Yeah, but it's great because it'll just result in more infighting with the LGBTQIA+ group.
His is all getting so beyond ridiculus now that I can’t even begin to follow anymore. So, um what is the IA at the end?
Itanium Architecture
Intersex and Asexual. I always forget the A. But the fact that they have a plus should say it all.
It's so insulting to adoptive parents.
They can celebrate non-birthing people day next month.
When is ‘complete and utter idiot’ month?
It's called cognitive dissonance. You strain very hard to try to explain the massive amounts of evidence that women are outranked by Pakistanis/blacks and transvestites.