They are allowed to demand data for everything, even though their arguments are unfalsifiable, but you can't use data that makes them uncomfortable either.
Example. Housing and Urban development has found that Black's are disproportionately denied home loans from Wells Fargo. Ignore low credit scores lawsuit ensues.
Crime statistics show that blacks are far more likely to commit gun violence than any other race. We need to look at other factors at play.
Did you drop this /s?
I hate the convention of the /s, especially in a post irony world.
I also hate how it has become necessary in so many cases. But I have no idea what you were trying to say in the earlier post.
They are allowed to demand data for everything, even though their arguments are unfalsifiable, but you can't use data that makes them uncomfortable either.
We are in agreement on that.
Example. Housing and Urban development has found that Black's are disproportionately denied home loans from Wells Fargo. Ignore low credit scores lawsuit ensues.
Crime statistics show that blacks are far more likely to commit gun violence than any other race. We need to look at other factors at play.