would someone explain why a white woman identifying as black is unacceptable (Dolezal said "challenging the construct of race is at the core of evolving human consciousness") whereas a woman identifying as a man (or vice versa) is acceptable. - Kotaku In Action 2

would someone explain why a white woman identifying as black is unacceptable (Dolezal said "challenging the construct of race is at the core of evolving human consciousness") whereas a woman identifying as a man (or vice versa) is acceptable. (twitter.com)

posted 3 years ago by SophiesBoyfriend 3 years ago by SophiesBoyfriend +70 / -1

31 comments

31 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (31)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– RoulerBleu 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

"to say "MtF are closer to F than M" by which they mean "MtF are closer to F than MtF is to M" but it's actually saying "MtF are closer to F than M is to F"

Moreover, the "trans lesbians" ( autogynephiles, heterosexual males with a fetish of seeing themselves in "woman version" ) do not show the same partial feminisation of a few brain structures.

And homosexual males have the same partial feminisation of a few brain structures regardless of "gender identity".

TL;DR : Most "trans science" on brain structure is basically detecting a physiological inclination for homosexuality, and running with that to draw flimsy conclusions.

While ignoring that "trans lesbians" brainscans falsify their hypothesis.

permalink parent save report block reply