Even if no one doxes this people the threat of doxing is enough. You can get away with doxing people that the left does not agree with so the jurors must know by now that the media, the democrats and the law will not protect them.
At least the Judge has been upset with them. After spending the whole trial warning the Prosecution I'd be surprised if he didn't let the defense call a mistrial.
He denied the request yesterday, but basically stated that if the Jury returned any guilty convictions they have an automatic appeals route that is likely to get the case thrown out upon appeal. In ordinary times I'd agree with the Judge.
However, that was yesterday. Today with the President weighing in and various media outlets publishing enough about the Jurors that could lead to them being identified the defense could very well bring up another motion for mistrial citing jury tampering.
The biggest problem is that Chavin is likely a dead man if he goes to prison before any such appeals would be heard.
And now we have a judicial system that can be threatened with political violence in order to get it to ignore certain cases.
Realistically, how far are we from this?
Even if no one doxes this people the threat of doxing is enough. You can get away with doxing people that the left does not agree with so the jurors must know by now that the media, the democrats and the law will not protect them.
This is not a real trial.
At least the Judge has been upset with them. After spending the whole trial warning the Prosecution I'd be surprised if he didn't let the defense call a mistrial.
He refused a motion for mistrial yesterday, basically said he thinks Chauvin would win an appeal if found guilty of anything.
Guy is too spineless to stick his own neck out for the mob, he's hoping the jury will do it for him, or failing that, an appellate judge.
Appeals judge: "We won't overturn the previous ruling; but I bet if you appeal again you'll be free."
Higher appeals judge: "We won't overrule the previous appeal; but I bet if you appeal again you'll be free."
Supreme Court: "We don't want to hear it."
Damn
Didn't the judge already state a mistrial is a possibility?
He denied the request yesterday, but basically stated that if the Jury returned any guilty convictions they have an automatic appeals route that is likely to get the case thrown out upon appeal. In ordinary times I'd agree with the Judge.
However, that was yesterday. Today with the President weighing in and various media outlets publishing enough about the Jurors that could lead to them being identified the defense could very well bring up another motion for mistrial citing jury tampering.
The biggest problem is that Chavin is likely a dead man if he goes to prison before any such appeals would be heard.
And now we have a judicial system that can be threatened with political violence in order to get it to ignore certain cases.
I have nothing but contempt for the Supreme Court and its lesser kin.
Pretty far. By the time it gets that far they'll just murder potential jurors they do t like before selection