Low birth rate are not genocide

By law, they are, yes. You don’t know what genocide is at all. You’ve been brainwashed into thinking it doesn’t exist–and therefore not fighting back against it–by the people responsible for it.

“In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group;

2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”

~ Resolution 260 (III) A; United Nations General Assembly; December 9, 1948

The Encyclopedia of Genocide outlines 12 categories of propagandistic denial tactics. They follow here, with generalized examples of lies told by the propagandists, and afterward refutations thereto. A refresher on what a conspiracy is–and the tactics used to ensure execution thereof–might be helpful, too.

1. Question and minimize the statistics. “Whites are the majority in white countries; their population is going up, not down.” The halves of this sentence are entirely separate concepts, neither of which refutes the existence of a genocide. Whites remain the majority of the population in many white countries, yes. But remember that just 100 years ago, they were the exclusive population in these countries. It is only white nations which are seeing invasion by other races. Additionally, the percentage of whites in white nations has been dropping precipitously over the last 75 years. That they are “still” the majority is hardly comforting. As for the numerical value of whites increasing, this is only locally true–true for specific locations and regions. Many white nations’ numeric white populations have also peaked and are now declining. The value is increasing more slowly than the amount of any other race’s population, due to the abject collapse of white birthrates. This collapse was forced.

2. Attack the motivations of the truth-tellers. “These are just crazy claims by white supremacists and racists.” This the guilt by association fallacy, shown in example in the conspiracy chapter. “You’re insane if you think that you are being exterminated!” says the man doing the exterminating. The claims are not crazy; they are mathematical fact. Moreover, the people doing the exterminating have publicly admitted–in writing, on video, and in laws themselves–that their actions are purposely reducing the white population of the world. Truth is only hate to those who hate the truth. No one but the guilty would want the truth made illegal to say. 3. Claim that the deaths were inadvertent. “There is no coordinated plan to eliminate the white race. That is just a conspiracy theory.” This ties into the previous statement. We have documented evidence that the deaths are not inadvertent; they are purposeful.

4. Emphasize the strangeness of the victims. “White people have historically enjoyed disproportionate social privileges. Now their countries are becoming just like the rest of the world.” Whites have enjoyed prioritized social privileges… in their own nations. Africans have enjoyed prioritized social privileges… in their own nations. Asians have enjoyed prioritized social privileges… in their own nations. Only whites are told that they are not allowed to have nations of their own. There are many African nations which refuse citizenship to anyone who is not African. The same goes for Asians, who remain notoriously discriminatory against foreigners owning land, becoming citizens, or invading their countries and cultures in other ways. This is healthy. This is normal. This is how things are supposed to be. Only whites are disallowed this.

5. Rationalize the deaths as the result of tribal conflict. “White people are just worried that they will no longer enjoy the privileges of being an ethnic majority.” Yes. We are. For the reasons stated above. It is healthy to be worried about this. It is normal. It is how things are supposed to be. Nations are supposed to be mono-ethnic. People feel safer, happier, healthier, and can do more good when the world is this way. We are worried that we are being exterminated in our own homes. Because every social change in the last century has done exactly this.

6. Blame ‘out of control’ forces for committing the killings. “Most immigrants are peaceful and hard working. Islamic extremism is a very small minority and does not represent the immigrant population.” This statement, specifically about Islamic “extremism,” is objectively, mathematically false. The reason will follow here. But the same holds true for invasion by any foreign ethnic, religious, or social group to white nations. The forces are entirely in control–just forcibly stop them from entering the country, from owning land, from living there at all. This is fully in control. All we must do is physically rise up to demand it of our governments.

7. Avoid antagonizing the victims, who might walk out of the ‘peace process.’ “Reconciliation is the first step toward solving issues of race in the West. We must learn to live together.” No. We don’t have to learn to live together. There are irreconcilable differences in the species of humanity. We innately hate each other, when living together. This is healthy. This is normal. This is how things are supposed to be. The people committing genocide on whites are terrified of whites “walking out of the ‘peace’ process,” because that would mean whites grabbing our guns and physically demanding that our nations be restored to ethnic homogeny. And it means that the people responsible for this will be punished by whites for their crimes.

8. Justify denial in favor of current economic interests. “Immigrants are crucial to our economic recovery. Immigrants perform jobs most people do not want and spend money that helps grow the economy.” As we have seen, immigration–legal or illegal–does nothing but hurt the economy. Moreover, immigration–specifically immigration from other ethnic groups–is a net drain on the economy and the bill is specifically footed by the whites they are replacing.

9. Claim that the victims are receiving good treatment. “White people today are still well above average in terms of education and financial success.” This, too, is irrelevant. That whites are more successful–whether in their own nations or in others’–is in no way “justification” for a reduction in their numbers. That others are below the average set when whites are also involved only lends further proof of the necessity of separation.

10. Claim that what is going on does not fit the definition of genocide. “Mass immigration is not the same as genocide. Genocide is the destruction of a people.” This is an appeal to ignorance. As we have seen, the definition of genocide explicitly also includes “bringing about conditions of life designed to reduce the number of the group.” The authors of our laws explicitly stated that the purpose of the law is to reduce the white population. Even if they hadn’t, the result of the law has been the reduction of the white population.

11. Blame the victims. “White people should atone for their history of racism and privilege. Accepting refugees and immigrants from less fortunate countries is crucial to this process.” Whites are blameless. We are the victims of genocide. There’s an old saying, and I’ll mention it again: “The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.”

12. Say that peace and reconciliation are more important than blaming people for genocide. “The most important thing is that people from all cultures can learn to live together peacefully. There is no reason for a crazy ‘white genocide’ witch hunt.” Nothing more than a statement of fear from someone–a group of people–who are terrified of retribution and punishment for their crimes against humanity, and their involvement in the genocide of Europeans.

It is, subhuman shill. You’re now complicit in the denial of genocide, according to international law.