I got R16'd, why is there like 200 comments on a thread about naked kid drawings? The fuck happened while I was gone?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
News came out about Minds - https://www.sankakucomplex.com/2021/03/21/alternate-social-media-site-minds-ceo-labels-loli-illegal-bans-users/
There were defenses of free speech, faggots from ConsumeProduct (and probably some TheDonald) raiding the forum and creating threads in their community to pile on, some resident KIA2ers "thinking of the children", and the usual disingenuous fuckery.
As always, the people who cry out loudest are usually the aggressors, so hopefully none of the moral fags are around kids nor procreate for the safety of real children.
People actually use Minds? I never thought it was any good.
I don't really give a shit either way about what happens to it (I'm not going to view it, obviously. I don't use Minds to start with!) I just thought it was weird that people were so into that topic that it reached a high reply count.
That's not always true. After all, the ballad of the pervy male feminist is what gave that theory logic, and that one links more to feminists choosing people they can blackmail to be their allies.
No, I don't think many here use Minds at all. In fact, I doubt many have even tried it.
Similarly, most of us don't give a shit about loli or shota, but it was never about personal preference.
You can see proof in the names and arguments, and even this thread. Lots of Plebbit behavior.
'loli stuff' has been such a hot debate button online that I'd say it's practically bait. If you browse that thread, you'll probably understand why it draws such a crowd, but I'll summarize: both sides are fighting for their principles so hard that it makes it hard for negotiation to occur.
I can't really say when it became such a topic, but I started paying more attention to it in relation to culture war stuff having to do with imageboards being attacked.
And minds has now started banning people not just for loli but for "the canonical ages of characters" (even characters like Jotaro) WHAT DID WE FUCKING TELL YOU
It's the same problem I have with Gab. Pretend to be for free speech but really they just want to protect racist speech.
Which I'm not entirely opposed to, but don't pretend you're for freedom when you're not, in the same way Twitter shouldn't be billing itself as the town square and a way to keep in touch with people when they will interfere if you communicate ideas they don't like.
Porn isn't speech lol. You're really reaching there. Supporting freedom of speech doesn't mean you support freedom for every other topic. It's not one bit hypocritical.
It's an inconvenient thing for you to support, so you write it off as not speech. It's completely hypocritical and you can't even be a man about being a hypocrite.
The homosexual lobby used it to great effect, so why would you not expect others to copy it?
Nah, pedos pretend to be not pedos. If you argue that this degenerate garbage is not pedophilic, then pedos would obviously not have to pretend that they do not like it.
Furthermore, I don't car either way. Just don't shove it in my face, nor pretend that cartoon child pornography is 'free speech' and that forums have to allow it.