Why would I care what happens after I die? I won't know any of it.
What was the point of your life? Only to suffer because of your imaginations about wahmen?
Remind me who Islamists vote for? The moment they start making moves towards power will be when they get jettisoned.
Hmm... 5'1" army vs. radical Islamists. Methinks I can see who is going to be the victor, and who is going to be the sex slaves.
Not exactly, but if you're naming your organization/movement after something evil, it doesn't exactly look innocent.
Correct, it doesn't look innocent. Whether or not it is, depends on further investigation, not assumption. In this case, they're virtue-signaling about a Wahmen's History Month. Which is dumb, but unlike your fevered imaginings, not a plot to kill you.
This is interesting though. It is good, however, to associate the people who use the slogan (most of who are brainless tarts who will have no clue about its origins) with the origins, in order to tar them with it, and in order to tar feminism with it. Problem is that you do it in a way that makes you look crazy (because you are), instead of them.
You think/hope.
Alright, how many people who voted for "feminist policy" are aware of this 10% nonsense?
5'1 army with a full military arsenal from K.Harris plus all US allies vs radical Islamists with a few smuggled in half-working AKs. Suddenly not such a sure thing.
Like actual professional soldiers managed to defeat Islamists in Iraq? Don't count them out.
I obviously don't think the company making the game wants to kill me, but their endorsement of people who do makes them unworthy of my money.
You harm your own case when you overstate it like that. I don't like this nonsense either. But if the exaggeration sticks out even to me, you can imagine how much it will seem ridiculous who isn't in the most 10% of anti-feminist people.
I don't know, how many? Considering a literal convicted murderer was chosen as a DNC speaker to appeal to female voters, probably a lot.
I am pretty sure that had nothing to do with the fact that she was a woman. There was something else about her, one aspect you always like to ignore.
I'm pretty sure the UN will turn a blind eye to any war crimes committed there, so I doubt they'll have issues.
Pretty sure the UN is as impotent as always.
They genuinely do want to harm people, and it's not just the slogan origins and insane manifestos that make me say that.
I don't doubt that they want to harm people. Or rather, that harming people is no price at all to pay for what they really want, which is to gain power. Note that the 'they' here is feminists.
If you're in the most 10%, I must be in the 0.0001%.
Likely, yes.
Do you know who I'm talking about?
I looked it up. Quite interesting. I thought it was your usual, but at least there was some core of truth to this tidbit of madness. But for it to be effective, it would have to be deployed wisely.
What was the point of your life? Only to suffer because of your imaginations about wahmen?
Hmm... 5'1" army vs. radical Islamists. Methinks I can see who is going to be the victor, and who is going to be the sex slaves.
Correct, it doesn't look innocent. Whether or not it is, depends on further investigation, not assumption. In this case, they're virtue-signaling about a Wahmen's History Month. Which is dumb, but unlike your fevered imaginings, not a plot to kill you.
This is interesting though. It is good, however, to associate the people who use the slogan (most of who are brainless tarts who will have no clue about its origins) with the origins, in order to tar them with it, and in order to tar feminism with it. Problem is that you do it in a way that makes you look crazy (because you are), instead of them.
Alright, how many people who voted for "feminist policy" are aware of this 10% nonsense?
Like actual professional soldiers managed to defeat Islamists in Iraq? Don't count them out.
You harm your own case when you overstate it like that. I don't like this nonsense either. But if the exaggeration sticks out even to me, you can imagine how much it will seem ridiculous who isn't in the most 10% of anti-feminist people.
I am pretty sure that had nothing to do with the fact that she was a woman. There was something else about her, one aspect you always like to ignore.
Pretty sure the UN is as impotent as always.
I don't doubt that they want to harm people. Or rather, that harming people is no price at all to pay for what they really want, which is to gain power. Note that the 'they' here is feminists.
Likely, yes.
I looked it up. Quite interesting. I thought it was your usual, but at least there was some core of truth to this tidbit of madness. But for it to be effective, it would have to be deployed wisely.