"Fact" one is an axiom, and "facts" three and four are moral pronouncements. None of which depend on the correctness of "fact" two.
Even if the ACLU accepted that "fact" two was false it would have no effect on the validity or invalidity of the other statements, because they aren't dependent on the correctness of "fact" two.
"Fact" 3, like "fact" 2, is objectively false. The bio girls who lose or drop in placing because of the men involved don't benefit, they clearly and undeniably suffer.
1 and 4 are simply opinions, which one could have regardless of any actual facts.
"Fact" one is an axiom, and "facts" three and four are moral pronouncements. None of which depend on the correctness of "fact" two.
Even if the ACLU accepted that "fact" two was false it would have no effect on the validity or invalidity of the other statements, because they aren't dependent on the correctness of "fact" two.
"Fact" 3, like "fact" 2, is objectively false. The bio girls who lose or drop in placing because of the men involved don't benefit, they clearly and undeniably suffer.
1 and 4 are simply opinions, which one could have regardless of any actual facts.
1 is objectively false as well. Definitions can not be altered to mean whatever the speaker wishes them to mean.