Two particularly disturbing parts
(2) PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION: Psychologist must be approved by the AG.
(3) DATABASE: All gun owners will be listed in a publicly accessible database.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
Wouldn't survive contact with the courts.
You have too much faith in the courts.
After what ive seen in the last 3 months, hell fucking no
Not at all.
It's simply that I'm Quaker. If you're waiting for me to advocate for direct action, you'll be waiting forever.
We aren't waiting on you to call for direct action, and I'm sure a fair amount of people respect pacifism.
Still, there is a big difference between wishful thinking "the courts will handle it" and a call to action. If the courts do pass this you and presumably other quakers will just turn in your weapons based on your response. I guess hiding them is not a direct action either, so that is a possibility.
Regardless, even if you did support a "direct action" it would not be smart to comment that on a public forum.
"What's that? You want to strike down my proposed laws as unconstitutional, courts? Well, I'll just keep adding new justices until you say what I want you to say" - Franklin Roosevelt (paraphrased, but accurate). And quite possibly President Harris as well.
Go ahead.
The twenty states you're still president of afterwards will probably cheer.
How stupid are you? Courts are stacked with nothing but activists.
Doesn't matter.
If you want direct action you'll have to do it yourself.