You are clearly obtuse, a company free of responsibility from our bill of rights is insane. To say you have a right to censor others speech simply because you operate the platform makes you a publisher. Therefore anything 'published' under your platform is your responsibility as you chose to control the speech on the platform. You cannot have it both ways, either you are responsible for the content published or you are not. To say you are not and then control the speech is against the good faith clause. You have no rational argument, because you are basically saying that companies should have no responsibilities for their actions, which is redundant.
This is just plain retarded. Websites are not homes, they are platforms. These platforms operate as public squares, which means they fall under the protection of free speech. There is no private right to censor the public. The vote with your wallet adage is equally retarded when the government has allowed these companies to become monopolies and dictate as the public square. Your comments can be editorialized by the website, so if they choose to do so, it would make them an editor and publisher. Once again you keep throwing away any responsibility the companies have to the constitution and the law.
You are clearly obtuse, a company free of responsibility from our bill of rights is insane. To say you have a right to censor others speech simply because you operate the platform makes you a publisher. Therefore anything 'published' under your platform is your responsibility as you chose to control the speech on the platform. You cannot have it both ways, either you are responsible for the content published or you are not. To say you are not and then control the speech is against the good faith clause. You have no rational argument, because you are basically saying that companies should have no responsibilities for their actions, which is redundant.
This is just plain retarded. Websites are not homes, they are platforms. These platforms operate as public squares, which means they fall under the protection of free speech. There is no private right to censor the public. The vote with your wallet adage is equally retarded when the government has allowed these companies to become monopolies and dictate as the public square. Your comments can be editorialized by the website, so if they choose to do so, it would make them an editor and publisher. Once again you keep throwing away any responsibility the companies have to the constitution and the law.
You keep parroting the same bullshit, either make an actual argument or concede.