Can you think of anything more harmful (aside from pro-pedo arguments, and that comes next anyway) to non-political gays than "let us fuck in public or you just don't accept gays?" Because, if that becomes mainstream, a lot of people are going to just say "fine, I don't accept gays. Get (figuratively or in private!) fucked, and get out of my face."
Then again, we've also seen how sheeplike people are. I'd imagine a surprising number of people (although nowhere near as high as compliance to other issues) would start cheering on public gay sex, because, hey, at least I'm not racist or homophobic.
I hope it doesn't happen, of course, but it would be funny to see progressives - and, even funnier, compliant and uncomfortable normies - in regular conversations try to make "you're a bigot if you won't watch queers fuck in the streets" a thing. Heck, I hope the chans don't get hold of this. They could probably make this shit happen in six months or less.
Can you think of anything more harmful (aside from pro-pedo arguments, and that comes next anyway
The very same degenerate screenshot here has admitted to being sexually attracted to children.
than "let us fuck in public or you just don't accept gays?" Because, if that becomes mainstream, a lot of people are going to just say "fine, I don't accept gays. Get (figuratively or in private!) fucked, and get out of my face."
People are so terrified worn down that I think they will accept anything. It's more than overdue that homosexuals be told "no".
I'd imagine a surprising number of people (although nowhere near as high as compliance to other issues) would start cheering on public gay sex, because, hey, at least I'm not racist or homophobic.
Coming up with things that normal people will not accept is not a bug, it is a feature. Read Sowell's Vision of the Anointed if you haven't. This has been going on in other forms for a very like time, like advocating for murderers and rapists. Anyone can advocate for a virtuous person, but the SJWs think that advocating for murderers and rapists sets them aside as being wise.
Can you think of anything more harmful (aside from pro-pedo arguments, and that comes next anyway) to non-political gays than "let us fuck in public or you just don't accept gays?" Because, if that becomes mainstream, a lot of people are going to just say "fine, I don't accept gays. Get (figuratively or in private!) fucked, and get out of my face."
Then again, we've also seen how sheeplike people are. I'd imagine a surprising number of people (although nowhere near as high as compliance to other issues) would start cheering on public gay sex, because, hey, at least I'm not racist or homophobic.
I hope it doesn't happen, of course, but it would be funny to see progressives - and, even funnier, compliant and uncomfortable normies - in regular conversations try to make "you're a bigot if you won't watch queers fuck in the streets" a thing. Heck, I hope the chans don't get hold of this. They could probably make this shit happen in six months or less.
The very same degenerate screenshot here has admitted to being sexually attracted to children.
People are so terrified worn down that I think they will accept anything. It's more than overdue that homosexuals be told "no".
Coming up with things that normal people will not accept is not a bug, it is a feature. Read Sowell's Vision of the Anointed if you haven't. This has been going on in other forms for a very like time, like advocating for murderers and rapists. Anyone can advocate for a virtuous person, but the SJWs think that advocating for murderers and rapists sets them aside as being wise.
Funny, I kinda hope the chains do this because it would be "peaceful protest" levels in f delusion as people fuck behind newscasters