Recently got a temp ban from KiA2 for very mildly acknowledging this fact. Just testing the waters here.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (142)
sorted by:
I don't think this can be disconnected from combating SJWs as a whole. Not just those among one ethnic group. Of course it is legitimate to discuss whether Jews are more likely to be SJWs, and if so why. But I have noticed that certain people cannot hold such discussions while keeping the spaghetti in their pockets.
Then you probably don't realize that many people, myself included, firmly resist any thinking in racial terms.
I mean... that resistance is the point...? I think most racists (racialists?) started from precisely this place of internal dissonance that ran counter to our observations.
I don't know an answer to the 'so what' question. If Jews are more likely to be SJWs, then so what? Why is this fact significant?
Black crime is significant because it results in somethings the identitairans whine about, like cops shooting black aggressors.
Other than that, it would just be a social problem.
Boils down to whether you believe in behavioral genetics, and whether policy should consider it, I guess. If you don't, everybody has the same potential, or the difference not significant enough to account for. I don't buy into the Tabula Rasa theory of humanity, though. If 3% of a population will engage in homicide, you need more restrictive measures to prevent homicide (and in turn, promote stability) than in a population where only .1% will engage in it. If you implement policy to stabilize the population with 3%, that's inherently oppressive to the population with .1%.
I think social problems are often genetic, to varying degrees. That includes tendencies to subvert, deceive, steal, rape, or murder. Not all of these acts are criminal, though.