Although I have a feeling they'd go after their non-white allies on the left too once they got rid of us.
You think non-whites are going to stand for being lectured by blue-haired shrews? Let alone Muslims? Their complete BS ideology has been subverted, which is why they ignore the massive rape statistics when it's Favored Groups committing the rape. Same for Rotherham, Cologne and other stuff.
What's more likely, non-white men realizing women aren't their allies
Non-white men are not a monolith, but since white women are such absolute chumps, it is very easy to take political advantage of them if one wants.
Intersectionality is already collapsing
Again, you say that to justify trying to work with them to take out their enemies.
That didn't really answer the question. What value are they to us though?
They keep poking at the intersectionalist house of cards, from another perspective. I find this quite useful.
You want them on the opposite side to us because sane people will take our side.
They're not going to join the other side. They're actual feminists, meaning that they try to make things better for women - whether just or unjust. Intersectionalists support rape gangs and men in dresses, so that's not pro-women.
I've had okay interactions with female users here.
Alright, now I know I'm dreaming.
But I've posted on GC as well, probably for the same reasons. In general, I find them to be much more reasonable than intersectionalists, though often nuts still. Anyway, even if they were crazier, they would still be very useful.
I don't lose my mind over you because in the end of the day, you aren't an infiltrator from their side. You are hated by them just as much as I am.
This is pure identitarianism. So it is because I am male.
Do you think NZ is suddenly going to prioritize anyone over women?
Absolutely. Jihadi Jacinda would prioritize Muslims and grooming gangs over women. Same for transvestites. That is intersectionality, but you don't see that due to your tunnelvision.
I'm not working with them, I'm working for myself against people I personally hate.
You're working for the triumph of feminism, you mean. Cause that's what you're doing by cheering censorship of the enemies of intersectionalists.
I have, notice I said okay and not good. I can keep things sane and professional, but never friendly.
Why? What does it say that I have better interactions with radical feminists and even intersectionalists than you can with a woman? Aren't you what you hate?
Who do you hate more, the CCP's spies or the idiots who think China is our friend? That's the best analogy I can think of.
The latter. Not sure this is how your analogy was supposed to work.
You think non-whites are going to stand for being lectured by blue-haired shrews? Let alone Muslims? Their complete BS ideology has been subverted, which is why they ignore the massive rape statistics when it's Favored Groups committing the rape. Same for Rotherham, Cologne and other stuff.
Non-white men are not a monolith, but since white women are such absolute chumps, it is very easy to take political advantage of them if one wants.
Again, you say that to justify trying to work with them to take out their enemies.
They keep poking at the intersectionalist house of cards, from another perspective. I find this quite useful.
They're not going to join the other side. They're actual feminists, meaning that they try to make things better for women - whether just or unjust. Intersectionalists support rape gangs and men in dresses, so that's not pro-women.
Alright, now I know I'm dreaming.
But I've posted on GC as well, probably for the same reasons. In general, I find them to be much more reasonable than intersectionalists, though often nuts still. Anyway, even if they were crazier, they would still be very useful.
This is pure identitarianism. So it is because I am male.
Absolutely. Jihadi Jacinda would prioritize Muslims and grooming gangs over women. Same for transvestites. That is intersectionality, but you don't see that due to your tunnelvision.
You're working for the triumph of feminism, you mean. Cause that's what you're doing by cheering censorship of the enemies of intersectionalists.
Why? What does it say that I have better interactions with radical feminists and even intersectionalists than you can with a woman? Aren't you what you hate?
The latter. Not sure this is how your analogy was supposed to work.