Men aren't as affected by social pressure from their direct peers as women.
This is the same explanation that Abigail Shirer uses. But this directly contradicts your claim that delusional men are repsonding to others calling men evil.
Abusive mothers would explain that.
Thankfully there is no such thing as an abusive father.
Little cause?
Yup, little cause. You're angry that rabid feminist shrews demand special privileges. If you were a woman, you'd be angry that nearly all murders and rapes are committed by men. A little worse, don't you think? If you're this angry over that idiocy, how much more angry would you be over something that is so much worse.
Dr Money was even funded and supported by women's "rights" groups.
And if it was the other way around, with men's rights groups funding a female John Money, you'd be pointing out that Dr. Money is a woman.
No, they're responding to the hatred for themselves instilled into them throughout the school system, through popular culture and by political figures. Nobody's saying that someone will turn trans because they saw kill all men on Twitter. I'm saying that the culture we live in, the lack of male role models - particularly fathers and the lack of opportunities and positive experiences allowed for men is a direct and obvious factor. It explains why transgenderism is a recent phenomenon and not one that has always been occurring. The propaganda apparatus wasn't strong enough. Life wasn't hard enough. They didn't have enough control over our lives and futures.
Did I ever say that?
I'd be angrier over skewed and largely bullshit statistics that were fabricated beyond any actual reality about a decade ago? Maybe if I was as delusional as I think they are. Their actions affect 100% of men. Criminals affect a tiny amount of people. By that logic, everyone should be racist because 13/50 meme.
. I'm saying that the culture we live in, the lack of male role models - particularly fathers and the lack of opportunities and positive experiences allowed for men is a direct and obvious factor.
See, you're much more reasonable than you let on. I am pretty sure that it is also lack of fathers that leads these girls to be delusional. These feminists generally have daddy issues.
Life wasn't hard enough.
Life is easier than ever now, which is the problem
I'd be angrier over skewed and largely bullshit statistics that were fabricated beyond any actual reality about a decade ago? Maybe if I was as delusional as I think they are. Their actions affect 100% of men. Criminals affect a tiny amount of people. By that logic, everyone should be racist because 13/50 meme.
You are though. You dislike and "don't trust" women because a small group agitates for privileges, you'd be an absolute Godzilla if you were female and there was a small group that committed rape, murder, thieving, etc.
If 9% of women calling themselves feminists is reason enough to dislike women, then 1-10% of men being criminals sure as hell would be reason enough to dislike men if you were female.
But you have a tunnelvision. I don't mean this as an insult, but are you autistic? I ask specifically because you seem to lack theory of mind.
I think you're being overly kind there. I really doubt that the meme of daddy issues whales actually holds up in real life. Even in my experience it doesn't. I knew a girl who was crazy to the point that she'd be posted here, but I only found out when she accidentally added me to a group chat with her friends. I knew another girl for years and she turned out to be a BLM fangirl, so I cut her off completely. Now she sends me random gifts as a way to try and get me to talk to her again. I reject them all, I'm not a woman. I would never take advantage of that kind of thing.
Maybe for women. For men it's just one biased process to the next and just hoping you make the cut with the weight dragging you down.
You should know by now that I am extremely skeptical that only 9% are feminist. The rest of your argument falls apart when that is considered.
This is the same explanation that Abigail Shirer uses. But this directly contradicts your claim that delusional men are repsonding to others calling men evil.
Thankfully there is no such thing as an abusive father.
Yup, little cause. You're angry that rabid feminist shrews demand special privileges. If you were a woman, you'd be angry that nearly all murders and rapes are committed by men. A little worse, don't you think? If you're this angry over that idiocy, how much more angry would you be over something that is so much worse.
And if it was the other way around, with men's rights groups funding a female John Money, you'd be pointing out that Dr. Money is a woman.
No, they're responding to the hatred for themselves instilled into them throughout the school system, through popular culture and by political figures. Nobody's saying that someone will turn trans because they saw kill all men on Twitter. I'm saying that the culture we live in, the lack of male role models - particularly fathers and the lack of opportunities and positive experiences allowed for men is a direct and obvious factor. It explains why transgenderism is a recent phenomenon and not one that has always been occurring. The propaganda apparatus wasn't strong enough. Life wasn't hard enough. They didn't have enough control over our lives and futures.
Did I ever say that?
I'd be angrier over skewed and largely bullshit statistics that were fabricated beyond any actual reality about a decade ago? Maybe if I was as delusional as I think they are. Their actions affect 100% of men. Criminals affect a tiny amount of people. By that logic, everyone should be racist because 13/50 meme.
See, you're much more reasonable than you let on. I am pretty sure that it is also lack of fathers that leads these girls to be delusional. These feminists generally have daddy issues.
Life is easier than ever now, which is the problem
You are though. You dislike and "don't trust" women because a small group agitates for privileges, you'd be an absolute Godzilla if you were female and there was a small group that committed rape, murder, thieving, etc.
If 9% of women calling themselves feminists is reason enough to dislike women, then 1-10% of men being criminals sure as hell would be reason enough to dislike men if you were female.
But you have a tunnelvision. I don't mean this as an insult, but are you autistic? I ask specifically because you seem to lack theory of mind.
I think you're being overly kind there. I really doubt that the meme of daddy issues whales actually holds up in real life. Even in my experience it doesn't. I knew a girl who was crazy to the point that she'd be posted here, but I only found out when she accidentally added me to a group chat with her friends. I knew another girl for years and she turned out to be a BLM fangirl, so I cut her off completely. Now she sends me random gifts as a way to try and get me to talk to her again. I reject them all, I'm not a woman. I would never take advantage of that kind of thing.
Maybe for women. For men it's just one biased process to the next and just hoping you make the cut with the weight dragging you down.
You should know by now that I am extremely skeptical that only 9% are feminist. The rest of your argument falls apart when that is considered.
A lot of these people are just brainwashed. I'd give it a try to see if they are open to being fixed, and cut them off if they are not.
I'm glad to see you come around to 'tradcuckery'. Victorianism FTW.
That's now how 'skepticism' works. You think every single woman is a feminist in disguise. That is paranoia, not skepticism.