The Bellwethers - wrong for the first time
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
A little context please? Is it predictions?
No, he's saying that these places have voted in such a way as to align exactly with the final result of the election in a significant majority of cases (which is what everything in green is). Strangely, they seem to be nearly unanimously wrong in 2020.
Almost as if the results of the election don't match up with the actual vote
Well an unprecedented level of massive fraud by the Democrats in various states such as WI, MI, PA, AZ, GA and NV would surely go against all of the historical predictors, let alone just the bellwether counties.
What is the probability that almost ALL of those bellweathers (and a lot of other reliable and accurate indicators of election results) are wrong at the same time in a fair election?
Practically Zero. Harris's win does not pass the smell test and we all know something is fishy in this election, especially in the Democratic strongholds.
These are districts which are so-called bellwethers because they represent the "average voter" and the results of the bunch of them combined has always matched the overall election result - until 2020, when it was massively "wrong". I.e., yet another indication of electoral fraud. According to the bellwethers, this election should've been a strong win for Trump.
JFK "won" that election via rigging by the large corrupt Democratic party machine in Cook County.
Atleast JFK didn't utterly despise America and he eventually was put down by the powers that be for not following their orders.
Kamala Harris would claim power and she would be the furthest thing away from JFK.
That's not a good argument, because that would mean the other half the bellwethers would be wrong instead.