Styx calls out Tucker Carlson on Hunter Biden
(www.bitchute.com)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
I must admit that I agree that most people bringing up the Hunter Biden scandal are missing the mark. The story should not be how Joe's son is a degenerate crackhead and possible incestuous pedo, but that Joe Biden is a tough on crime democrat that heavily contributed to the laws, the systemically white supremacist laws, which Hunter is breaking. Thus, the pressure should be applied to finding out whether Joe knew and covered up for his son, while other people's children were being thrown in prison by Joe's own hand.
Joe Biden's hypocrisy isn't the story here either. The real issue is the fact that China obviously had all of this compromising information, and that would be sufficient grounds to deny Joe Biden high level security clearances. How can you have a president who is not qualified to see classified information? Unless that's the plan...
The FBI has also had this information for over a year. Why have they not come forward with their findings? Why is the investigation still "open"? One theory is that they wanted it as leverage over a president Biden. This tracks with the realization that the FBI, like many federal agencies, is a converged organ of the permanent bureaucracy.
I don't disagree with your argument at all. There's definitely several attack vectors that are better than "Hunter is a degenerate". However, I think the hypocrisy approach would resonate better with normies. Nobody likes the "rules for me, but not for thee" shit, and the left would have a more difficult time addressing it when they want to throw out the laws Joe passed.
Unfortunately, the barely complicated stories of security clearance and intel agencies is too much for the masses to even begin to find interest in.
Here's the kicker, though. When you go with a story that is damaging to Biden, especially right now, it's guaranteed to get censored and hidden and very efficiently at that.
Anything more complex than "his son had sex with [person]" would never see the light of the day with most normies. What's more, the immediate reflex of "Russian propaganda" becomes a lot weaker when you've got actual pictures to immediately corroborate the sex scandal, rather than having to read a couple of paragraphs to digest the scandal. It's therefore much easier to get that stuff to stick and go viral.
Very true
That is an impossibility. The system only exists by decree of the President; a system which includes a clause I'd paraphrase as "Fuck you, I can read whatever I like."
Actually, I think the larger story is that Globalist NGO's, the EU, and the Obama administration overthrew the Ukrainian government in a Color Revolution, almost solely to use the entire country of Ukraine as a giant money pit for them to personally profit from.
This is worse than what happened with Guatemala and United Fruit Co. (Dole) with the CIA. This was an international effort to throw a sovereign country into Civil War, which lead to an economic collapse, thousands of Ukrainian dead, and major standoff with Russia (probably as a pretext to start a major war against them), mostly so that these globalist cronies could pocket some cash.
They destroyed a country to make a buck.
This is some straight up die-hard villain level shit.
It's insanely corrupt and completely disgusting. Yet, just like I said to u/Throwawaycuzmeh, this is simply too much for normies to grasp.
I don't think it's too hard for them to grasp, it's just that they're not used to hearing this level of sadistic corruption.
I genuinely hope that you are right and that I am wrong.
Why would they hear about it? All they listen to is the propaganda machines controlled by those who would engage in such saddism.
My point exactly. It's not like most normies know about United Fruit Co.
We have to remember that Tucker Carlson works at Fox News.
They got RINO Paul Ryan making big decisions. They got leftist trash like Donna Brazille and Chris Wallace working there.
As much as I can enjoy Tucker's musings on some subjects, his job at Fox leaves him open to being influenced by the globalists.
Tucker had to choose, is his job more important or is speaking the truth more important?
It seems clear that he has chosen preserving his job.
Tucker Carlson is good for dispensing some redpills in a digestible manner to normies but he is not the fighter that the right needs to continue the populist movement after Trump's second term.
Uh, I think Styx completely missed the point.
Tucker threatened Hunter on air.
Tucker disguised what he was saying a bit, but the gist is: "We have a lot more information on the level of degeneracy that Hunter has been up to. We know you swiped the fucking USB stick to see what we had. We have much, much, worse that we aren't talking about... because we choose not to talk about it because we're being very, very, nice people. If you want to play stupid games, you'll win stupid prizes. Don't pull a stunt like that again."
Honestly, if that's what was really happening, then why the fuck would Tucker pull his punches? If they have crazy bombshells to drop, why would they not drop them?
We don't know what he has.
It's an old tactic. Always keep some people in reserve so that you can deploy them to re-enforce a gap, double up on an attack, time a secondary attack, or cover your withdraw. It's good to have reserves, and it's bad to blow them all at once.
The likely reason is that anything that leads to Hunter's or Joe's arrest would likely result in absolute chaos, and possibly a civil war. If they have truly incriminating evidence, they are going to wait until after the election (assuming Trump wins) before taking any action.
If Trump wins, and they STILL don't arrest one or both of them, then we'll know either Trump sold the country out, or there actually was no further evidence to begin with, and the goal of all this posturing has been to try and bait the Biden's into making some kind of huge mistake (like the Dems did with General Flynn).
There's still the fallback of "the swamp". There's enough plausibility in the idea that the system is corrupt enough that the arrests wouldn't be made no matter what evidence they have. Trump could sell out or this could be the extent of the evidence, and there might just be enough deniability for it to not stick.
I don't disagree with his criticism of Tucker Carlson, but I think part of the reason he's lauded so much at the moment is he stands out amongst his mainstream peers as being the one who's at least appears to have the most autonomy.
I'm not sure what the alternative would be, don't have him in the spotlight at all? Because he would be replaced with someone who is just more of a propaganda puppet. That doesn't help anything, because the fact of the matter is there's loads of people that only consume mainstream news, including those that are only Fox News viewers.
I'd much prefer people learn to question things and understand that all news is presented with a bias. I don't think that's going to happen though, so I'll take what I can get.